Investing in Crypto-Assets with Hedge Fund Manager, Dr. Jeff Ross

Today we have a pretty unusual guest for WCI on the podcast. Readers and listeners have emailed requesting that we get him on the podcast, and we thought it would be an interesting conversation. Our guest is Jeffrey W. Ross, MD, MBA. He is the founder of Vailshire Capital Management and Vailshire Partners hedge fund. He was a speaker at the Bitcoin 2022 Conference, and he is a board-certified radiologist. He's an interventional radiologist, fellowship-trained, and just retired last year in 2021. He has contributed to the Motley Fool as well as Seeking Alpha. We talk all about Bitcoin and cryptocurrency and why it is or is not a viable form of currency and if it is something we should buy into—or not. We know this is a controversial topic with the WCI audience, so we hope you find this conversation interesting.

Listen to Episode #263 here.

 

Why Dr. Ross Gave Up Medicine for Finance 

Let's talk about your upbringing and how it influenced your views on money. Obviously, at this point, you have a lot of interest in finance, but tell us about how that occurred.

“Even as a kid, I was always interested in investing. My mom always used to play things on the radio, teaching how to save and invest wisely and things like that. Even from an early age, it's been ingrained in my mind. When I got to college, I was interested in both investing and becoming a doctor. As we all know, you have to make that decision and it's a big choice. I chose medicine. I went down the pre-med route. That whisked me away from anything finance and investing for a very long period. I did med school and then my residency in radiology. Then, I did a fellowship in interventional radiology, finished all of my training in 2008, and my family and I moved out to Colorado right after that.

Within 6-12 months, I remembered that I love investing and I always had it as a hobby. About then, I had a little bit more free time finally, working in private practice, and I started a blog teaching people how to invest on their own. After doing that for a couple of years, I got picked up by the Motley Fool and Seeking Alpha, writing investment advisory articles for them. I was kind of a stock-picking guy, focused on healthcare and technology. By that time, I had enough of a following of people who said, ‘Hey, we love the way you do things. Could you invest my money for me? I don't want to do this myself.' I said, ‘Oh, no, I'm just a doctor. I just do this for fun.' But it planted a seed in my brain and I thought, ‘Well, man, if I could do this for a living, that would be kind of fun.' So, Vailshire was born out of that as a side gig thing.

Fast forward a little bit to 2013, and I founded Vailshire. In 2014, I started managing the hedge fund called Vailshire Partners. It started out as basically a stock-picking value-oriented healthcare and technology fund, a long-short fund. About eight months later, I started managing separately managed accounts including IRAs for clients and brokerage accounts and things like that. A few years later, I got my MBA in finance. I did everything backward. I started as a doctor and worked my way backward. By the time I got to 2021, I had been doing both things for seven or eight years. It was pretty intense as you know, managing two different jobs. But I was able to retire from medicine in 2021, which was fantastic. I've been doing just Vailshire since that time.”

You're still young. I mean, you're not that far out of residency since 2008. You spent a long time learning to be a doctor. Was there any reason you left medicine other than the fact that being a hedge fund manager pays a lot better?

“Well, that's one fallacy. Being a famous hedge fund manager does pay better. My salary has dropped substantially since I just moved to Vailshire. I was doing pretty well as a private practice interventional radiologist, and I was a partner in our group. I went pre-med back in 1994. From 1994-2021, medicine consumed my life. I loved it. I really enjoyed IR. I enjoyed being a radiologist. I enjoyed the patient interactions. I didn't love the call. Admittedly, I didn't like being on call every fourth night, and I didn't like it when my pager went off at 2:00 in the morning. I also could not shake the feeling that I was just a cog in the healthcare system and I could not fix it the way I wanted to. It was very frustrating. I didn't like arguing with health insurance companies. I couldn't stand the rising costs that were affecting our patients, as you know. I'm the guy that does the biopsies and says, ‘Oh, shoot. It looks like you might have cancer.' Then I see these patients and I'm putting the chest ports in for chemotherapy, or doing cryoablation therapy for some tumor or something. Then those patients tell me about their hospital bills costing $50,000, $100,000, $200,000. They're kind of looking at me accusingly like I'm the one causing these rising healthcare costs, and it's frustrating and it's sad. I see those rising costs and all of the inefficiencies in the system as well, the bureaucracy of it all. All of the middlemen, all of the administrators, all of that stuff was very frustrating for me.

I used to talk about this with my partners and I'd think, ‘Man, if I could just get out and just do finance for a living, it'd be a way better quality of life. I wouldn't feel so bad about being a part of this healthcare system.' I obviously love it. Obviously, I chose my career and went down that path. I'm not anti-healthcare. I'm not anti-MDs at all. But there are problems that need to be fixed, and some problems may never be fixed in our lifetime. It was actually a relief when I finally did retire. I don't regret it at all. I felt like I put in good time and I'm ready for part 2 of my life in the next career.”

More information here:

10-Step Guide to Retiring at 45

 

Don't Quit Your Day Job Just Yet

Thanks for sharing that. I wonder how many docs listening to this podcast are thinking, “Wow, I wonder if I could be a hedge fund manager.” I bet there's somebody that would be inspired to try something similarly. Do you have any advice to somebody that's thinking about exiting medicine into the financial world?

“I will tell you that you surmise correctly. I get probably five doctors a week on average who reach out to me and say that they are thinking really strongly about a plan B. They're frustrated with medicine, or for whatever reason, they're thinking about moving on to something else. They ask if they could be a hedge fund manager or could they move into finance, and what do I do? I just tell them they have to follow their passion. If you want to do this, first, I say, don't give up your day job. It is really hard to find the kind of income you get from medicine. You're highly specialized. You're very good at what you do. You get paid very well. This is not how the rest of the world works. You do not get a job that pays like a physician being a rookie at Fidelity or working at a bank or something like that.

Don't quit your day job. Think of it as a side gig, if you want to do it. Look into what specifically you are interested in. Not everybody is cut out to be a hedge fund manager. There are different personalities for every different kind of specialty in medicine, and it is the same for finance. Think about what you really would want to do and then start doing some work, start publishing your work.

I think the easiest way for people, if you want to follow my route, is to start writing articles and start trying to get published on a place like Seeking Alpha, which is pretty easy. They're pretty inclusive, and they allow a lot of people to come on and publish things. You'll find out quickly if you're good at it or not. If you write a bad article, you'll get mocked and ridiculed. You're either going to learn from it from getting humbled or you will realize it is not for you. If you still have a passion for that after a couple of years, then yeah, maybe think about managing money for a living.”

 

Vailshire Partners Hedge Fund's Transition from Stocks to Crypto Assets 

Your fund has made a bit of a transition. When you started, it was primarily picking stocks, as you mentioned, healthcare and tech stocks. In more recent years, you've specialized a bit more in crypto assets. Tell us a little bit about that transition.

“Just being a guy in finance, I'm always looking for the best sharp ratio with risk-adjusted returns. Being kind of interested in technology, to begin with, that was an easy segue into the whole crypto universe. It was back in about 2015 or 2016, where I first got introduced to this space. This was all outside of Vailshire, by the way. At first, it was just me trying to sort this stuff out. I first got into Bitcoin back in 2016-ish and then started getting into all of these other altcoins over the ensuing years. I wrote that big ramp-up that everybody remembers. It was a huge parabolic and moved higher in 2017. I thought I was a genius. Everybody did. People were dropping and quitting their jobs to become full-time crypto traders. Every crypto that came out was talking about being the next and the better Bitcoin. You basically couldn't lose. You could be a monkey and you could throw a dart at any crypto, and you would make a lot of money. It would go up 5X or 10X or 100X for some people.

But then came the reality. At the end of 2017, we had these highs. Bitcoin almost hit $20,000 and then began crypto winter. In early 2018, everything started to fall. My story is funny, especially if you know about my persuasion now for Bitcoin. I used to own a lot of Bitcoin. I sold all of that to buy all of these other cryptos that I thought might be shinier and better than Bitcoin. They crashed very hard. I had taken some profits in 2017, but by 2018, my altcoin and all of those things that I owned—this whole portfolio—dropped by about 90%-95%. Then I got hit with just a gigantic tax bill in 2018 for my short term capital gains in 2017. I learned a huge lesson. It was intense. I didn't like it. I checked out of it for the next several months.

Early in 2019, I fell down the proverbial rabbit hole of Bitcoin and did a deep dive into it. I wanted to know what makes Bitcoin different? If it's such a terrible technology and if it's just a tulip craze, why hasn't it gone away? Why does it keep sticking around? What is it that makes it different? I spent a lot of time in early 2019 studying Bitcoin itself. Then I started educating my Vailshire clients on that as well. We started getting our portfolios in there. A lot of my clients were very reluctant to own any of it, because they were kind of scared of it. They read the headlines and thought it was used by criminals and it wastes energy and the government's going to shut it down and it is too volatile. All the common narratives you hear. But I was able to show them that a 1% allocation to Bitcoin in a portfolio was no more volatile than a Valishire portfolio without the Bitcoin. The difference was the portfolio with Bitcoin had a significant increase in performance. That's how I started getting my clients into it and have been educating them ever since. I'm now focused primarily on Bitcoin. I spend a lot of time teaching people about the difference between Bitcoin and crypto, even though Bitcoin is the original crypto. In the common day, the modern-day parlance does not equate with what crypto is. I think there's big distinctions.”

More information here:

Top 7 Uses for Bitcoin

 

The Difference Between Bitcoin and Other Crypto-Assets and Cryptocurrencies 

Let's talk about this dramatic difference you see between Bitcoin and other crypto-assets and cryptocurrencies like Cardano, Solana, Ethereum, etc. Why is Bitcoin special?

“Bitcoin is just simply better money. That's all it is. Bitcoin exists to be the antithesis of government fiat currency. There are many reasons why, but basically Bitcoin is decentralized, whereas government fiat obviously is centralized. It's run by the Federal Reserve. It has these unknown policies that we wait every six weeks to hear what the Fed is going to say what the current policy is. Are they going to tighten? Are they going to ease? Are they going to print more? Are they going to start selling off assets? Back in 2017 and 2018, when I was involved with it initially, I didn't know the difference. There was a big battle for what would be the new currency or the new money of the internet. I would say the new world's money for the digital age. The battle was between Bitcoin and then Bitcoin Cash, BSV, Litecoin. All of these other things that are basically the same type of proof-of-work protocol as Bitcoin, who could be the best, decentralize the most secure money. I didn't know at the time. Being totally honest, I had a basket of all those because I had no idea what would win. In fact, I sold all my Bitcoin because I thought it might be one of the other ones.

Over the last five years, all of those currencies, at best, are down 65% to Bitcoin, and the worst ones are down about 98%. To me, the world has clearly chosen Bitcoin as the primary currency for the digital age. Now, that's different than all the other altcoins, the whole crypto world—for example, Ethereum, Cardano, and Solana. All these other things are totally different. These are technology platforms that are basically trying to be multi-functional base layer protocols to do all of these things that people like to do. Things like smart contracts, speculation, arts, gaming, and entertainment. They are not meant to be money. There was a false narrative going around for a while that Ethereum is ultra sound money. That's not what Ethereum was designed to do. It's basically a technology platform or technology protocol. I like to say from a snarky point of view, it's basically venture capital technology, venture capital that's loosely or awkwardly glued to the blockchain. A lot of the stuff that they do, you don't need the blockchain for. It's just kind of the thing that's super popular right now. The Metaverse, and Web3 are all crypto and it's totally different from just Bitcoin, which is simply better money.

That is how I categorize the two. I think I have backing with that view because Gary Gensler, the chair of the SEC, clearly states Bitcoin. He sees it, I think, as simply better money; it's just decentralized non-governmental money. All of this other stuff, he views as unregistered securities. They have centralization, even though they talk about being decentralized or DeFi—Decentralized Finance. They basically are centralized protocols. They have a head, they have founders. They're built on the proof-of-stake system, which is similar to how stocks are done. Whoever owns the most controls the protocol the most and gets to make the decisions. It tends to lead to a “rich get richer” kind of thing because they can stake their larger stakes to earn more interest and increase their stakes. It is totally different from the whole proof-of-work protocol of Bitcoin. They are two totally separate things. I think Gary Gensler sees that. I think that regulations and legislation is going to see that over time. It starts with the SEC. I think we're going to see that over the next couple of years.”

More information here:

Most Popular Cryptocurrencies

What Is Blockchain?

 

Is Bitcoin Really Working as a Currency? 

You talk about Bitcoin as money. Back in, I don't know the first time I heard about it, 2011 probably, people talked about Bitcoin being a currency. Now I talk to people and most of them admit, “OK, it's really not working out as a currency. I'm justifying it by it being a store of value.” Or they just freely admit, “I'm speculating on it. I think I'll be able to sell it later for more.” I feel like in the beginning, the idea was that it was a currency, a currency we'd actually be using in our day-to-day lives. Over the last decade-plus, that hasn't really panned out. I'm still not using Bitcoin as currency. I'm not buying gas with it. I'm not buying pizza with it. I'm not using it to move money around between my accounts. Why aren't we yet using Bitcoin as currency? What happened? How could so many people be so wrong about that?

“That's a great question. I would caveat that to say that people are so far sort of wrong, but they will be right eventually. The way that money always gets decided by a society going all the way back thousands of years, when people used to use seashells or limestone rocks as currency or gold and silver, is it starts out as a collectible. Then, it becomes a store of value. People start to see that it's more than just a collectible. This thing actually holds value and increases in value over time. I think is going on with Bitcoin. As it gets more solidified and the world starts to settle on it being a primary functional store of value, it becomes more of a medium of exchange. That is because what needs to happen for Bitcoin specifically is you need the infrastructure to be built out for it to become a medium of exchange. I know you probably know all this. You know about Lightning. The Lightning Network is getting more popular. If you were paying attention to the Bitcoin conference recently in April in Miami, Jack Mallers has recently, through his company called Strike, partnered with the organizations that do the scanners that you go to in all the stores. They do the checkout lane scanners. When you put your credit card in there, right now it has the choices for Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express. Before this year is over at most major retailers—including Starbucks, McDonald's and Walmart—the fifth option is going to be Bitcoin. The deal is already done. They're starting to implement that and put it out.

Pretty soon, over the Lightning Network, you will be able to make transactions. You can do that any way you want. It's just using the Bitcoin network itself. You can pay with US dollars that then quickly gets converted to Bitcoin and then back to the retailer as dollars, or you can pay with Bitcoin. You can do this around the world. I could make a transaction right now in any country, or any person, and I could do it instantly without permission and with basically a less than a penny fee to make that transaction. To me, that's very revolutionary, but we're still in the awkward early phases where it's getting built out. The infrastructure isn't quite there yet, but for those of us who are in the industry, we see it coming. To me, it's very similar to where the internet was in about the late 1990s where personally, I didn't get it early enough. I thought, ‘Well, that's kind of cool. I can send an email to somebody.' I liked it when it made the little ping sound when I got mail.

But it seemed awkward. It was clunky. I couldn't imagine what it was ever going to be used for. That's the phase we're in right now with Bitcoin, I believe. It's really hard unless you're a visionary to see what the internet would become 15 or 20 years from the year 2000. I think we're at that same awkward, clunky early phase of Bitcoin, as well, where it's going to become so much bigger and more ubiquitous than it is right now. If I could just go on a quick tangent. The growth of Bitcoin and the pricing of Bitcoin is based on the adoption of it. User adoption. It's based on this theory called Metcalfe's Law, which is basically the value of the network is based on the number of users squared. The internet and things like cell phone usage and personal computers, all follow this S-curve of adoption. Bitcoin is following that exact same schedule. In fact, it's actually a little faster than internet adoption was. That's why I say the 1990s. We're in the late 1990s phase for adoption of Bitcoin. But it's actually growing faster than the internet and a little bit faster than cell phone adoption. If you put a price tag onto that, you can see the price projection of Bitcoin over time. That's what I use to value Bitcoin.”

You think we're just too early?

“Yes. I think we're early.”

We're too early to judge that it's not working out as a currency? You think we'll overcome the speed issues, the energy use issues, the volatility of it as a currency? You think that'll all be overcome and we'll actually be using it as a currency to buy our gasoline and other daily products?

“I absolutely believe that. I think as the methods for it being a medium of exchange become much easier and more ubiquitous, we won't even think about it anymore. It'll be as easy as giving a credit card to a machine or tapping our credit card. We'll be doing that with Bitcoin. I think that we'll actually see that within a year. Right now, getting to your point as a unit of account, it's very volatile. That's good if you're an owner, the volatility. It is very volatile, but it's more volatile to the upside over time. The Sharpe Ratio is still just incredibly impressive. There is volatility for sure. As it gets bigger, the law of large numbers, it gets harder for it to have these huge, massive fluctuations. We will reach a point eventually where it gets to be so big that the volatility will substantially decrease. It will become a much better unit of account at that point.

One other point is that right now it is treated by the IRS as property. So, it gets taxed like property. Every time you make a transaction, if you sell Bitcoin to buy something, it's a taxable event. That's an issue as well. I think at some point—and it's already happening in some small countries right now—but I think in the US this will happen probably by the end of this decade where it will be treated as a currency from a tax perspective. That will change things, too. If I can just pay for things and not trigger taxable events, I think the use case of it would significantly increase at that point.”

 

Bitcoin Is Still Very Volatile 

That's certainly another barrier, the taxation of it. I haven't run the numbers, but it seems to me the volatility isn't decreasing. It's been 10 or 12 years. It's not getting less volatile yet, but you think at some point something's going to happen that makes it less volatile?

“First of all, if you are thinking of it as a long-term investment, you don't want it to decrease in volatility. That's basically when the gains have been significantly squeezed out of it. If it turns into more of a blue-chip stock or the US dollar, that's when we've already gotten way up here on the adoption curve. It's much less interesting as a kind of a life-changing investment sort of thing.”

But much more useful as a currency.

“Much more useful. The gains will decrease over time, but use cases will increase over time. It's good and bad. That'll be a great thing, though, for the world at that point. Why would it be a good thing? Because Bitcoin is a disinflationary currency. That's the monetary policy. It's a perfectly scarce asset that will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin, as you know, vs. the US dollar. Mathematically, the US dollar can be printed infinitely. As we know from math class, if you can print something to infinity, the value of each individual unit goes toward zero over time. All fiat currencies literally go to zero over time historically. That's just a mathematical certainty. If Bitcoin continues to be adopted on schedule as it is, and it's perfectly scarce, the value just increases infinitely over time. I'm not saying it goes to infinity, but it increases over time just with the growth of the world and the growth of productivity throughout the world. So, it will be, I think, an ever-expanding price point for Bitcoin over the long run.”

More information here:

Cryptocurrencies Like Bitcoin Are Not Investments

 

Long-Term Predictions for Bitcoin

Let's talk about your long-term predictions for Bitcoin performance, and let's talk in terms of probabilities. Maybe each of the three following possibilities. The first is that 10 or 20 years from now, Bitcoin is worth dramatically more—let's say $500,000, a million dollars or more per Bitcoin. A large amount, a big, huge gain. The second possibility is that it's worth something similar to what it's worth now in 10 or 20 years. It's still worth a five-figure amount. And the third is that Bitcoin goes to zero. What probabilities would you assign to each of those possible outcomes?

“You're probably not going to like this. You're going to think I'm crazy, but I would say for the first option—that it's going to be at least $500,000 to a million 10-plus years from now—I would assign a 90% probability of that. I would assign probably 9% that it would be flat. I think it's almost a 0% chance that it goes to zero. I'll give it a 1% chance that it goes to zero. I used to have tons of concerns about Bitcoin. I was as skeptical as anybody in the beginning. My biggest concern back in 2018 and 2019 was that the US government was going to see it as a threat and shut it down. It could have been shut down by the US or by China. They could have put up the energy stack in order to do a 51% attack, and they could have done things to try to crush it. They could have pulled a China and said, ‘All Bitcoin miners are banned. It's illegal to own Bitcoin. If you own Bitcoin, we'll throw you in jail.' They could have done all that.

But something happened. From the Trump administration to the Biden administration, they switched from being adversarial to appearing to come to the conclusion that we can't do anything to stop this. So, what we need to do is keep our fingers in it. We need to regulate it. We need to tax it. We got to flush out the criminals and the criminal activity and make it hard for them to operate, but we can't stop it. I don't see, at this point, any chance realistically that it goes to zero. The bigger concern would be if people just stop adopting it and choose something else instead. I think the likelihood of that is extremely low because the world is already deciding. I think the main reason is because most of those other currencies, those other cryptos, focus on what you're talking about, the medium of exchange. They want to be an easy medium of exchange. They increase the ability of the network to make lots of transactions on their base layer. The downside of doing that is that it cannot be as decentralized when you do that. It actually becomes more centralizing over time. Instead of spreading the power of the money, the monetary network, out to the people across the world and making it very easy to run a node, they make it harder to do that. It makes it more centralized. The bigger players tend to accumulate more of it, and they get to set the monetary policy over time.

Bitcoin has those features. We do not need a better medium of exchange in the world. The US dollar is a fantastic medium of exchange. Credit cards are just fantastic. They're super easy. They're super quick. Merchants don't like credit cards because they get the fee of 3% plus 50 cents of each transaction every time you swipe a card. We literally have thousands of medium of exchange options. That will come for sure with Bitcoin. In fact, it already is coming on layer two and it will come even more on the third layer. But what we desperately need is a store of value. We have government fiat currencies that are literally designed to depreciate in value over time. Meaning that we lose our purchasing power year after year. We see prices of everything rising over time. The monetary policy of Bitcoin literally, it turns it on its head. It's the exact opposite. It will make life cheaper over time. The longer you hold US dollars, the more expensive life gets. But the longer you hold Bitcoin, the cheaper life gets over the long run. That's why I'm such a big proponent of it.”

 

Shorting Bitcoin Proxies 

Despite being a big proponent, I understand your fund was short Bitcoin earlier this year. Are you still short Bitcoin as we record this in mid-May 2022? I think it's down 50% percent from its peak right now. Are you still short?

“That's a funny rumor. I've never shorted Bitcoin but people tell me that a lot. So, I'm not quite sure what they're talking about. In my fund, though, I have things I call Bitcoin proxies. If you can't own Bitcoin outright, you can own things that are proxies to them. You can own things like Bitcoin miners, crypto exchanges, like coin-based, things like that. You can own the Grayscale Ethereum product as well. Just like the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. I do short those things.

I say this sort of jokingly. When I'm concerned about a drawdown coming for the price of Bitcoin, I'm happy to short Ethereum or I'm happy to short Coinbase. I do those kinds of things. I do short proxies. Right now, I'm not short of any of those things. I'm actually short more equity markets, I'm short technology stocks, NASDAQ, innovation type stocks, which has been helpful. But I'm long Bitcoin. I have a hold forever core position of Bitcoin.”

How do you decide whether to be long or short on these Bitcoin proxies?

“In my hedge fund, this is how I think through these kinds of things. I have some assets that I view as hold forever assets. Sort of a Warren Buffett type approach. I just hold them. I don't care if they go up and down. I try to buy them when they're cheaper; hopefully, new cash comes in when it's cheaper. I can increase our funds' allocation to them. It's not worth selling them. These are just fantastic companies that I think are going to be bigger, better, worth a lot more, and provide shareholder value for the next five, 10 and 20 years. I have a core allocation to those sorts of things.

The other half of my portfolio, essentially, I call momentum trades. These are things that are kind of heavy on innovation. They tend to be high beta assets. A lot of them are sort of in the crypto Bitcoin infrastructure space. Those are where the proxies come in. So micro-strategy, lots of Bitcoin miners, exchanges, and then others like tech stocks. Shopify is a good example of that. Shopify is down 75%-80% from its highest. Thankfully we stepped out of that and we haven't had that fall. I buy those when they're in a bullish trend and when they hit a trailing stop, I sell them and we wait until a new bullish trend starts again.

To your point, Bitcoin has been down. It's down over 50% from its highs. This year, it has not been performing well, but it's not too terrible compared to the Bitcoin proxies. MicroStrategy is getting destroyed. Some Bitcoin miners are down 70%, 80%, or 90%. Those are getting to be so, so cheap. I'm just personally very excited. The way my system works is it waits for a bottom. It confirms a bottom based on momentum strategies. When it turns back into a bullish mode, we'll buy back into those.”

 

Hedge Fund Fees 

Let's talk a little bit about the hedge funds space. Now, hedge funds typically charge 2 and 20—2% of assets under management per year, plus 20% of profits. And of course, index mutual fund investors view that as highway robbery, because they're used to paying just a few basis points for management. I have a couple of questions—one about the industry in general and another about you in particular. About the industry in general, what's the justification for charging those fees? About you in particular, you actually charge less. You don't charge an annual fee. You charge 20% of profits above a high watermark. I'm curious why you chose not to do what the industry does.

“The 2 and 20 comes from the historical precedent that was set when hedge funds first came out. Back in the day in the 1960s, 1970s, even the 1980s, there were very few hedge funds. The hedge funds were doing things that most market participants didn't do or couldn't do, and they killed it. They made some fantastic returns. That's how they justified their fee structure of the 2 and 20. That to me is highway robbery. Charging that amount of money to a client, I don't know how those people sleep at night, but they do. For the ones who maybe kill it and they far outpace the returns of the S&P 500 over time, far outperform what you could do just holding Vanguard low-fee index funds, maybe the fee structure is worth it. There are tens of thousands of hedge funds now. I would say almost none of them can perform the way they used to be able to when they were the only game in town, back in the '60s, '70s, and 80s. I don't think that's a reasonable fee structure anymore. They see the same fee structure in venture capital, as well.

My hope was to be how I was when I was a doctor. I just wanted to be a good guy in a frustrating world. Healthcare gets maligned for lots of reasons, but there are tons of good doctors that are trying to do the best for their patients. I have the same approach with finance. I wanted to be good guy trying to help people in kind of a bad-guy world. Wall Street is very maligned, and for good reason. It exists to fleece people. It's sort of a middleman to take your money, even though you think you're going to make money.

As for my fee structure, I obviously started with that narrative of 2 and 20. I actually initially founded Vailshire Partners, the fund, and I started it with a 1 and 20 fee structure. I literally couldn't sleep at night. I felt that I could not do that to people. I definitely couldn't do this to my family and friends who were probably going to be my first clients initially. I just couldn't do it. So I decided I was not going to charge any management fee. I have 0% management fee and then a 20% incentive fee.

Basically, I tell people I don't make money unless you make money. If I lose money one year, I don't just have to start making money that next year. I don't start from that low point. I start from the high watermark at the end of the year where I have to exceed that in order to make any money. It's possible that I go one, two, three, four years without making any money if my clients don't make money from their initial investment. That feels fair to me, and that's how I sell it to my clients. My clients who are on board think that's great. They feel good in a way when we have a bad year. They're like, ‘Well, at least I'm not paying any fees for this and he's doing his best. He must be hurting, poor guy, because he's not making any money at all.' It's true. I'm just paying the administrative and legal fees into the fund to keep it going.

I think that's a reasonable fee structure. I think it's fair. For my separately managed accounts, that's a different fee structure. It's more traditional. I charge 1% of assets under management for amounts under $1 million. Then I decrease the fee as the amounts go above $1 million. Those clients tend to think that's a reasonable fee structure as well. That's how I do it and I think it's different from how Wall Street does it, but I feel good about it and it helps me to sleep at night.”

 

How Much Should Be Allocated to Bitcoin and Crypto Assets?

Let's turn the subject a little bit. A lot of my listeners are sitting out there going, “Well, how much of my portfolio do I put into Bitcoin, into other crypto assets?” What percentage of a portfolio do you think is reasonable to allocate to these sorts of assets?

“Here's how I feel about crypto. First of all, let's distinguish it again; there is Bitcoin and there is crypto. They are two separate things. Crypto itself, I view as basically pure speculation. I think of it as venture capital that's kind of awkwardly glued to a blockchain, and it's marked to market 24/7, 365. What is fascinating about it is regular people, Joe Shmoe investors that could not ever participate in venture capital suddenly can with the whole crypto world. I think that's why they're going crazy with it. But it can also completely wipe you out and wreck you. I view that mostly as pure speculation.

For every Ethereum that has done amazingly, there are literally 10 or 100 or more competitors that are coming for Ethereum's lunch. Ethereum is the pioneer of the multifunctional base layer, smart contracts, doing all that kind of stuff. But as everyone who uses Ethereum knows, it's getting very clunky. It's hard to use. It's super expensive. It's slowing down. It's having problems, and it's not as decentralized as people say. Vitalik [Buterin] wants to switch it from proof of work to proof of stake. They've literally been talking about this for about six years and still have not done it. It's always about two months away, but it never goes through. Then there is Solana and Cardano. Pick whatever chain, they're coming for it. They're better, faster, stronger. All the weaknesses of Ethereum, they can do these better. There's a chance that they could take over.

Why do I bring this up? Because nothing is permanent in the crypto world as far as I'm concerned. Even though the crypto space is probably going to expand over time, the individual names are going to be like lighting a match. They go up and then they go down and they go to zero or near zero over time. I think that's going to be the course of most of them. What do I tell people? They're pure speculations. If you want to speculate, that's your prerogative. If you want to go to Vegas and gamble money, totally your prerogative, go for it. You can speculate in whatever, but I recommend that you save in Bitcoin.

Where does it fit with a portfolio? I would say 0% for altcoins, or if you just think it's fun and you want to do this, and you think Web3 is amazing, and you think NFTs are going to be incredible, or the Metaverse is the next big thing, sure, chuck. But I would not put more than 1% or 2% of your net worth into anything like that unless you just have money to burn. Bitcoin is different. Again, I think of Bitcoin as savings. It's just simply better money. What I have seen from being in this space for many years now is that the more you know Bitcoin, the more you own Bitcoin, because you feel comfortable with it and you're comfortable with the volatility. I've seen people who go up to 100% of their net worth completely in Bitcoin. I do not recommend that, just to be very clear, but I will say that the more you own it, the more you're comfortable with it and the more you believe where it's going to go 5, 10, 20 years from now.

In Vailshire, as a case in point, we were all 0%. We got clients off 0 to 1%. And then we went up to about 5%. For the people who have been in for years now and who understand it, they want to go 10% or 20%. Some of them want to go up to 50%. It's just a comfort thing. For those people, I usually recommend that they start owning Bitcoin outside of their brokerage account, their IRAs, those kinds of things. Just buy Bitcoin separately, get it off the exchanges and hold it in cold storage yourself. It's a very personal decision for people. I view it as savings. It just depends how much of your net worth you want to have in savings. It's a personal decision for everybody, but I'm comfortable going up even to as high as 50% for some people.”

 

Speculative Assets

Now, you talk about speculative assets, speculation, etc. By definition, Bitcoin, as well, is a speculative asset. It doesn't produce earnings. It doesn't pay rents. It doesn't pay dividends or interests. Any investment returns on it depend essentially on convincing someone else to pay more for it than you paid for it. That keeps a lot of us from investing in it. Do you think it should? And if not, why not?”

“I think there are four stages to understanding Bitcoin. I think the first stage is skepticism and mockery or just disbelief of what it is. I think step 2 is speculation. Step 3, I think, is as an investment or as a portfolio hedge. Then stage 4, in the final stages, you just see it as better money, as savings technology. A lot of people think Bitcoin is risky because it's volatile. What I like to tell people is I think volatility only equals risk in academia. It's a made-up concept so that we can measure the volatility of an asset and put a name to it. I think what real risk is in finance is the chance of losing your purchasing power over time when you make an investment.

If you're holding the US dollar, you are guaranteed to lose your purchasing power over time from a mathematical perspective and from a monetary policy perspective. I would say that's risky, but finance, the traditional finance, and MBA courses would say that it's not risky. It's a risk-free asset. Like the US treasury is a risk-free asset. I would say you're guaranteed to lose your purchasing power if you hold that. Therefore, that makes it a risky asset. With that in mind, I think what's interesting about Bitcoin is that everything about its monetary policy is absolutely knowable. The only thing we don't know about it is its short-term price fluctuations. To me, that's super fascinating. We know exactly that every 10 minutes, there's going to be another tranche of Bitcoin released to a Bitcoin miner. We know that there only ever will be 21 million Bitcoins. We know that the last ones will be mined in about the year 2140. After that point, it will become a non-inflationary asset. It'll actually become slightly deflationary because if anybody loses their Bitcoin, they'll be a little bit less available.

Everything about its monetary policy is actually known. For me, that dramatically takes away a risk. Coming full circle, Bitcoin is not a company, to your point. It does not have cash flows. You can't treat it like it's a value stock. You can't do price to earnings, price of sales, discounted cash flow models. I get all of that. It's just simply better money. This is what Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger get wrong as well. They talk about it like it's a stupid trendy tech stock, but it couldn't be further from the truth from what it actually is. It's just better money. It’s just money that is the antithesis of government fiat currency. I don't see it as a speculation really. Could I be wrong? Sure. Could the world adopt a different kind of money for the digital age? Sure. I think that's extremely unlikely, though. I would encourage people not to think of it like a stock or a company or talk about it like it is, but just think about it for what it really is. It’s just money.”

 

Can We Put an Actual Value on Bitcoin? 

med school scholarship sponsor
Let's talk a little bit about valuing it. You had mentioned earlier some of the ways you value it. A lot of people, including me, find it difficult to value Bitcoin and thus hesitate to invest in it. For example, the only reasonable way I've really found a value is to look at the cost of producing a new one. Which is mostly an energy cost, something around $10,000, it's been estimated at. Then maybe add on some infrastructure staffing and security costs, but even doing that and even after this most recent 50% drop in Bitcoin, it's still dramatically overvalued. How do you decide when Bitcoin is overvalued or undervalued?

“I alluded to this earlier, but the way I look at Bitcoin, I use valuation models that are based on Metcalfe's Law. Based on demand and adoption of the technology. You can actually fit the curves like we talked about. When a new technology is basically world-changing and it becomes ubiquitous around the world, it follows an S-shaped adoption curve. Right now, Bitcoin is right at that bottom part and near the inflection point of the S-shaped adoption curve. You can actually figure out those curves from a mathematical perspective and create formulas that look at what the price should be. You can stick a price onto the adoption rate of Bitcoin, similar to what you could do for cell phones and the internet. They are all following that exact same curve of adoption. The only caveat is Bitcoin is actually getting adopted a little bit faster than the internet was and a little faster than cell phone adoption was as well.

When you put a price tag on that, you can find an expected base price of what Bitcoin should be over time based on the number of users who are using it. That has actually followed this curve since about the year 2011. That is how I value it. There can be variations in how you create those equations, but they're all basically about the same. What does that say to me? We talk about, is Bitcoin overvalued? Actually, right now with this drawdown, it's almost right along the baseline of that adoption curve. This is a point where I would call it a strong buy. I'll go out just a little bit based on these curves, the curves that I look at, and how I view this for its adoption, because the adoption isn't slowing down. It continues to go at a really impressive pace.

When you put a price tag to that, I have an end-of-the-year 2022 conservative price target of $50,000 for Bitcoin, that actually doubles to $100,000 or around there at the end of 2023. And then you can extend that out and it depends what sort of growth rate you use. I think that from here, a reasonable CAGR, compounded annual growth rate for Bitcoin, is somewhere between 45%-75% for the next decade. Forty-five percent would actually be much slower than it was last decade but more in line with a conservative user adoption for worldwide adoption of this technology. Hopefully, that makes sense. But those are the kind of curves that I look at to determine what price it should be.”

Of course, we haven't seen the whole curve. We don't know that it's actually going to follow that curve. Does that bother you at all? That at some point it may drop off and not do that S-shaped curve?

“That is the risk. There is a risk that people could suddenly say, ‘Hey, you know what? Bitcoin sucks. I don't believe in it anymore and we're going to adopt something else.' Or to my point earlier, Shiba Inu or some other thing is going to be the new world's currency. I just don't buy that anymore. I think that battle was fought and decided in 2017 and 2018. Bitcoin has, to me, become the clear winner for the world's currency. Basically, the only way for this to not happen would be just for people to lose interest in it, for adoption to completely drop off. I think that's really unlikely, but it is a possibility. I just think it's very unlikely.”

 

Crypto Is Complicated 

Now, crypto-assets are notoriously difficult to understand compared to a lot of traditional investments. Some of its fans suggest you need to spend at least 1,000 hours studying it to understand it. Yet, the old investing adage is “Don't invest in anything you don't understand.” Should we avoid Bitcoin and these crypto-assets, if we're not willing to spend 1,000 hours studying it?

“You can probably guess my answer to this. For crypto assets, for everything X Bitcoin, I would say avoid it because it's just pure speculation. At least that's how I view it, and it is very hard to understand. You can get a feeling for the industry and where it's going and the possibilities of it, but to try to understand an individual altcoin and what their protocol stands for and what it's actually going to do and how it actually provides value, I think ithat's extremely difficult. I would tell people to probably avoid it. That's my policy as well. I tend to avoid all other altcoin assets.

Bitcoin I do understand at a pretty deep level. I try to keep it simple for people. I think you can grasp it in 10 seconds. If I say it's basically money, it's better money. Why is it better money? Because it's the opposite of what the US dollar is. It's the opposite of government fiat currency. If people can click with the dislike of inflation and the dislike of their groceries going up every year in price and the way healthcare has increased in price, they can understand the impact of Bitcoin. I have college-age kids now. The same college I went to back in the 1990s, the current college is four times more expensive now than it was when I was there. That's what I talk to my kids about. Do you think the quality of the education has gone up four times since I was there? I mean, I think it's probably gone down slightly since then the way other things are going, but it's four times more expensive. That's what inflation is. That's what the devaluing of the dollar does to us. It makes life more and more expensive. It keeps us enslaved to the system where we're borrowing money, where we have to keep working to pay off our debts.

It puts people like you and me in business where we can tell people about investing and tell people about wise borrowing strategies and getting out of debt and how to invest in real estate and all these other kinds of things. Most of this industry will not need to exist in a Bitcoin standard world, I think, because when you have a disinflation currency and things tend to get cheaper over time, all you really need to do is work hard and save. If you have money that is actually appreciating your purchasing power over time vs. depreciating your purchasing power over time, there's really nothing more to do for your kids, for your family, for future generations than to simply just save it and hold on to it.”

 

Is Bitcoin Actually a Protection Against Inflation? 

Let me push back a little bit about this idea because I hear it a lot. That Bitcoin is this protection against inflation. We're now in the most inflationary environment we've seen since the early 1980s. Inflation is measured by CPI at about 9% right now and has ramped up dramatically over the last six months. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has dropped 50% in value. It doesn't feel, at least over this short time period, that it's protecting me from inflation in any way, shape, or form. How would you respond to that?

“I would say that you have to take a step back. Markets just don't work like that. There's not a one-to-one short-term correlation between things like inflation pops up. Inflation goes up. Inflation is down. Money printing is up, therefore the stocks are up. Money printing is down, stocks are down. It's not like that in the short-term. Markets just vary because of a million different reasons from day to day. If you back up, though, and look at the longer term, Bitcoin in the last five years is actually up 1,644% relative to the US dollar. I think that's pretty good inflation protection. I think it gets in the millions of percent if you look back 10 years. It's clearly appreciating relative to the US dollar.

Do I think that will continue at that rate going forward? No. The first year it was this brand-new asset so people piled into it. We're not going to have 1000X gains anytime in the near future. But do I think it continues to basically appreciate in value mathematically the same way that the US dollar depreciates in value over the long run? Absolutely. One more case in point. The US dollar is very strong right now. It's just crushing other currencies. It's spiking, the DXY is spiking right now. The Japanese yen is crashing. Other currencies look very weak compared to the strength of the US dollar. Just because the US dollar is strong right now doesn't mean it's a strong currency that you would want to hold forever. You're guaranteed to lose your purchasing power if you hold it over the long term, but in the short-term, it's increasing. The same thing, flip that on its head. Bitcoin is down in the short term. Yes, it's down 50% or even more since its recent high, but over the long run, again, it's like a programmed mathematical certainty to increase in value. I think it's actually a fantastic inflation hedge over the long run.”

 

Some Bitcoin Proponents Think It Will Save the World

Let's talk a little bit about worldview. Crypto proponents, both online and in real life, have an almost religious conviction and sometimes a unique worldview. Not that different from gold bugs, not that different from preppers in some ways. For example, I had someone trying to convince me a couple of weeks ago that Bitcoin is going to eliminate war from the world. What are your thoughts on this semi-religious belief system about Bitcoin? What are the downsides and risks of it being out there? And are there any upsides, too, such as putting a floor under Bitcoin pricing because these folks will never abandon it no matter how low the price goes and how long it stays there?

“To answer your last question first, yes. You can have zealots. You can have people who will hold it. They'll die for it. They will never sell. You know what a great example of this is? Tesla stock. Tesla is just a terrible stock based on valuation methods. Anything you look at tells us that Tesla should be like a $10 stock and not an $800 stock right now. There are people who will never sell Tesla, and they've been very rewarded for that. Bitcoin has those same kinds of zealots, that think of it like a religion. I'm actually a Christian. I would say that the worship of money has been around for as long as money has existed for humans to use. It's in the Bible. You shall not worship money. You can only worship one or the other, God or money. So don't worship money.

But people always have a propensity to magnify money, to worship money. I think that's just obviously an erroneous view and a goofy view. There are people who treat it like it's going to save the world. Like it's going to abolish all immorality, anything unethical, abolish wars. I don't agree with that. Bitcoin is awesome. It's better money. It will create better incentives for the world, but it doesn't solve the human condition. The human condition I would say of sin or of immorality or of bad people just trying to take advantage of people. There will always be bad people. Criminals who will use even a good thing like Bitcoin to take advantage of other people, to steal their Bitcoin. No, Bitcoin doesn't solve those kinds of problems. It should not be worshiped. It's not a God. It's just money. It's just better money for the world.”

 

Regulating Bitcoin

Now, world governments have been a little slow in determining how to regulate this and how to tax it. What problems and what opportunities has that created? The fact that they're still trying to figure this out.

“It created lots of problems initially. It's basically been the Wild Wild West. Bitcoin is what it started with and then all of crypto. Because it's unregulated, you get scammers, you get people who do what's called rug pulls, where they get you to buy into their crypto. Mark Twain was famous, I believe, for saying a quote, ‘What is a gold mine? It's a hole in the ground with a liar standing next to it.' I think that's true for a lot of altcoins in a lot of the crypto world. It's basically a liar or a marketer standing next to a white paper claiming to be able to do something. Then people buy into it, they get into the hype, they buy it. What does a rug pull mean? It means the founders take that money and walk away with it. The people who bought into it are left holding the bag, which is worth basically nothing at that point.

That's the downside of not having regulations. Those are coming. The SEC is very intent on trying to fix this. They've said many times they consider most of these altcoins to be unregistered securities. They're saying if you are an altcoin and you think that you are an unregistered security, then you need to come and talk to us. Otherwise, we're going to come after you. First, they've been going after the exchanges that host these altcoins and allow these unregistered securities to operate. They may start coming after the individual cryptos themselves, or probably worse for them would just be if they had a blanket banning of all of the exchanges and said, ‘You just can't buy or sell whatever the name of your altcoin is. You can't do that on our exchange.' That would probably make them go away, because there would be no more demand for them. So, that would take away the market.

Regulation is coming. I would be careful if I had a lot of my net worth in altcoins. I would be very careful; even stablecoins have issues. We just saw this week, the stuff going on with Luna and UST.  They are stablecoins and they lost their peg. I think the last time I checked it was like 85 cents to the dollar. The founders are doing what they can. They bought a bunch of Bitcoin and they have given all that Bitcoin back in order to try to stabilize their currency. There are lots of ways you can lose money in the crypto world. So, I just beg people to please be careful. If you don't understand what you're speculating in, please don't do it or consider keeping your speculation size really small.”

 

Taxation of Bitcoin 

Let's talk about taxation. The US government has elected to treat cryptocurrency essentially as an investment, applying capital gains tax every time it's bought and sold, short or long term, if you've held it for more than a year, as the case may be. It's also allowed, interestingly, enough for tax-loss harvesting without the 30-day wash-sale rule, although recent legislation that didn't pass would've changed that. Do you think the US government got it right? Do you think they chose the right way to tax this? How do you think it should be taxed? If it's digital gold, why is it not taxed at the collectibles rate of up to 28%? If it's a currency such as yen or euros, why is it not taxed as ordinary income tax rates like a Forex investment?

“To me, it's inevitable that Bitcoin within the next 10 years will be relabelled by the IRS as a currency. It will then be treated and taxed as such. The rest of crypto, which is not money, is different. It's more of a speculative investment per se. That's probably the best category for it. It's kind of hard. They may need to create a new category for it just because it's a new type of asset. I think that's more reasonable. I think the use case for Bitcoin will go up significantly when it gets reorganized,or reconsidered as a currency, especially if we want to use it for day-to-day purchases. If you're holding Bitcoin, what keeps tons of Bitcoiners away from using it as a medium of exchange on a regular basis is it creates a tax event every single time they spend their Bitcoin.

The wash-sale rule I think was a mistake. I think people can take advantage of those kinds of things. I'm a big fan of smaller government and less regulation to begin with, but some regulation is probably necessary. I think that will probably get changed sometime in the near future. And it will be more in line with how stocks are treated from a tax basis. That's probably what will happen for crypto as well. I think it'll just get treated like how stocks are treated.”

 

Security Issues with Crypto 

You alluded to some hacks and some problems in the space. The Wild West effect. Lots of investors fear losing their Bitcoin. They fear losing their Ethereum or Cardano or whatever due to hacks of exchanges or losing their keys. I mean, something like 20% of all the Bitcoin that's ever been mined has been lost at this point. How realistic is this fear and what can be done to counter these security issues?

“It is definitely realistic. I mean, it happens. We see exchanges getting hacked. I had an exchange personally that I used back in 2016 or 2017 that got hacked and all assets have been frozen. I still don't have those cryptos back because of that. We're four years into that. I see it happen to people all the time. What most Bitcoin proponents would tell you is when you buy a Bitcoin, get it off of an exchange and put it into cold storage and you can put it into a little USB kind of device where it can sit. Your key, which is essentially your password, is sitting there and it's secure and nobody can come and get it from you. You can't lose it unless you just flat-out lose it. But nobody can really take it away from you. It can't be hacked because it's not connected to the internet at that point.

I think it's just wise for people to consider that crypto exchanges are honeypots. Criminals want to go after that. They know that there are billions and billions of dollars’ worth of value in these exchanges if they can hack it and get into it. A DeFi protocol, a lot of people are trusting that because you can earn high-interest rates on whatever altcoin you have.  That's great but you're taking the risk that the people who created that DeFi protocol, who did the code, did not have any glitches in there that can be attacked. I would tell people to be very cautious with that and definitely not put a sizeable portion of your net worth into it. Just treat it like it is. It's a risky investment and your money is literally sitting there for savvy hackers to come and get. Make sure you know what you're doing. Take precautions.

If you own Bitcoin, I recommend actually spreading it out in multiple areas so that you're not vulnerable to any individual point. Treat it like you would if you had gold bars. You're not just going to set your gold bars out on the counter and see if somebody comes and takes them. You'd probably keep them hidden and take measures to make sure that they're safe. You do the same thing with cash. If you lose your Bitcoin, you lose your Bitcoin. There’s nobody you can call. There's no CEO to call to say, ‘Hey, I want my money back.' So, take precautions, treat it like cash, treat it like a gold bar and you'll do well.”

 

Vailshire Partners Hedge Fund

Let's turn now back to your fund. Your fund has a pretty good track record since inception. Really, a very impressive one. You say it's designed to produce Alpha in all conditions. When I look at your philosophy, the first rule is “Don't lose money.” The second rule is “Remember the first rule.” But in the last year, you've lost 37%. What happened in the last year?

“Yeah, it was a tough year. Two things happened. I'm a big proponent of Bitcoin. Bitcoin actually did well and was a major part of our fund last year. Because I was not able to hold Bitcoin directly, I was holding the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. Even though Bitcoin was up about 60% in 2021, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust actually went from a premium to a discount to nav. The performance of that asset itself was about 0%. Bitcoin went up 60%, GBTC was flat. So that was a terrible investment and a terrible way to have exposure to Bitcoin over the year.

The second part of it was that I was anticipating a big rampup into Bitcoin, similar to the last four-year cycles thinking that we'd have a parabolic move higher. We were very exposed to that heading into the end of the year. November and December, and then the first parts of this year were tough until I finally flipped bearish and put my investments more in line with my macro views. We've had a tough year, no doubt. A lot of our hold forever assets have been getting hammered, too. Things like most people own, too, Apple, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway. Those things have all been getting hammered. Some of them not as bad as the market, some of them worse than the S&P 500 overall. Thankfully, we have our system in place where we're stopped out of the much more volatile assets.

That's kind of how it works for us at Vailshire and works for me, from having a more growth and innovative type approach. We tend to drastically outperform when times are good. And then we underperform more when times are bad. Over the long run, we do very well. We're still significantly outperforming the S&P over three- and five-year stretches, which is nice. But it's been a painful year. I'm not going to lie. These are times where I think it's a fantastic time to be buying into a lot of these assets that are down 50% to 85% or so. I think we're getting close to a bottom. I can't promise anything obviously, I always have to watch what I say, but it's hard for me to conceive that they won't beat the market substantially in the coming years.”

 

Final Thoughts from Dr. Ross 

Now, our time is getting short, but you have the ear of somewhere between 30,000-40,000 high-income professionals, mostly doctors. What have we not yet talked about today that you think they should know?

“The first thing I would say is I'm a proponent of Bitcoin, obviously, based on our conversation. I just encourage you to think of it, first of all, as distinct from the rest of crypto and to simply see it as better money and then to take the time to figure out why. It really only takes a few hours of studying, maybe one or two good books. I think you'll be right there with me on that. If you don't have any allocation to Bitcoin, I would strongly recommend just getting off of 0% and maybe putting up to 1%. Thinking of it as a hedge to the fiat system, which I would say it's almost inarguable that the system is crumbling right now. We're seeing cracks in the foundation. We're living in very tumultuous times. Prices are getting high. We're going to be, I think, in a stagflationary environment for most of this decade.

I think the traditional 60/40 Vanguard index fund protocol that has worked really well for the last decade, I just don't think it's going to work very well this decade based on the prices of everything and how bonds are performing. There's a chance we could be at the beginning of a multi-decade bond bear market at this point, which would make owning bonds a pretty bad decision from a risk-adjusted return standpoint. That would be my main thing. Consider alternatives to just that. If you want to know more about, and I don't mean to be doing a plug right here, but if you want to learn more about these kinds of alternative strategies, look me up. You can go to vailshire.com. You can send me an email directly, just info@vailshire.com. I'm also always happy to answer questions about my macro views, finance, Bitcoin, that kind of stuff on Twitter. I'm on Twitter a lot. Feel free to look me up there and we can continue the conversation. “

I hope you enjoyed that interview. It was a little different from our usual fare, I'll admit, but it's fun to do different every now and then. I'll probably get a bunch of hate mail from people that hate it, who can't believe I put a hedge fund manager, much less one talking about Bitcoin, on the podcast. But I got hate mail when I put a professional cyclist on the podcast, too. So, I guess that's just par for the course.

I have to admit, I'm not convinced to go out and buy a bunch of Bitcoin, much less any other crypto assets at this point. He makes a strong case. He argues strongly for Bitcoin being the winner among these crypto assets. I'm not entirely convinced of that, but I'll admit the Lightning Network changes addressed significantly some of the concerns I had with Bitcoin. If they continue to come up with improvements on it like that, maybe at some point we will be using it as a currency. But man, it's been 12 years. How long is it going to take before we can start using this thing as a currency? It'd be great to find a way to cut down on the credit card fees you pay every time you buy and sell something. That would be wonderful.

Certainly, crypto assets have a significant benefit in getting assets out of a country in times of political turmoil. There's no doubt about it. Every time I fly internationally, I think about that when I see the $10,000 limit you're allowed to carry with you. Obviously, if you have a thumb drive with a bunch of Bitcoin on it, Bitcoin keys on it, you could take a whole lot more than $10,000. There are some use cases for it, but I'm a little skeptical that it's going to be this currency that we're all using within just a few years, because I've been hearing that now for more than a decade and it just hasn't happened yet. Maybe we are still early, but I'm starting to lose faith in it, I suppose. We'll see. I hope that was interesting to you, and you had a chance to maybe hear a different viewpoint than I put on the podcast about Bitcoin or on the blog about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

 

Sponsor

Bob Bhayani is an independent provider of disability insurance planning solutions to the medical community in every state and a long-time White Coat Investor sponsor.

He specializes in working with residents and fellows early in their careers to set up sound financial and insurance strategies. If you need to review your disability insurance coverage or if you just need to get this critical insurance in place, contact Bob at drdisabilityquotes.com today. You can email info@drdisabilityquotes.com or call (973) 771-9100.

 

Quote of the Day 

Theodore Roosevelt said,

“It is not the critic who counts. Not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.”

 

White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection

The latest WCI book has officially been released. The White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection is for anyone interested in protecting your assets. It's a relatively short book, and close to half of it is the most comprehensive list of state-specific asset protection laws that I know about. The asset protection laws are always state-specific. It is important to know what the laws are in your state and in the states where you may do business or have assets. If you're worried about losing everything to a lawsuit, if you just want to make sure you've done the basics of asset protection, if you want to learn more about advanced asset protection techniques, if you're thinking about going to see an asset protection lawyer, or if you've been named in a lawsuit, we recommend you pick up The White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection.

 

Milestones to Millionaire

#66 — Living Like a Resident Really Works

This professor in palliative medicine and physical therapist spouse paid off $339,000 in three years by living like a resident on $60,000-$80,000 per year. They paid a third of their income toward loans, refinancing a couple of times for lower rates. Along the way, they maxed out their tax-deferred accounts and worked hard to gain a financial education together. They want to spend their money in ways that increase their happiness and paying off their student loans did that!


Listen to Episode #66 here.

Sponsor: PearsonRavitz.

 

Full Transcript

Transcription – WCI – 263
Intro:
This is the White Coat Investor podcast, where we help those who wear the white coat get a fair shake on Wall Street. We've been helping doctors and other high-income professionals stop doing dumb things with their money since 2011.

Dr. Jim Dahle: `
This is White Coat Investor podcast number 263 – Investing in crypto-assets with hedge fund manager, Jeff Ross MD, MBA.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
This podcast is sponsored by Bob Bhayani at drdisabilityquotes.com. He is an independent provider of disability insurance planning solutions to the medical community in every state and a long-time White Coat Investor sponsor.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
He specializes in working with residents and fellows early in their careers to set up sound financial and insurance strategies. If you need to review your disability insurance coverage, or if you just need to get this critical insurance in place, contact Bob at drdisabilityquotes.com today. You can email info@drdisabilityquotes.com or you can call (973) 771-9100.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's share our quote of the day today. This one is from Theodore Roosevelt. One of my favorite quotes. He said, “It is not the critic who counts. Not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
And I appreciate that quote, especially anytime you put your name out there or any of your thoughts, your philosophy, anything online, there's always a lot of criticism that comes back. And so, it's good to remember that the credit really belongs to those doing the work, even though they're also the ones who are getting all the criticism.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Speaking of criticism, I had a really funny email exchange this week, and I think you'll enjoy it. But I share it with you, not just because it's humorous and it makes for interesting content, but also because it emphasizes how important the work you're doing is and how difficult it can be. And what it does to you when you're tired and exhausted, and you've been working all night, etc. But I'll share it with you and you can chuckle with it as I have and the WCI staff has and as the emailer has as well.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
But anyway, I get this email and it reads, “I was excited to pick up this book and learn about investing after getting my foot in the door by reading Rich Dad, Poor Dad. You can imagine my surprise when finding out that the first pages of this book were verbatim plagiarized from Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Generic examples from Rich Dad, Poor Dad were adjusted to seem like the personal experience of the author, James M. Dahle, without even having the common sense to change the numbers slightly. I will not be taking advice from this man. And he should be sued, if he has not been already for the blatant and lazy plagiarism. I would be following up to try to report this.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Well, you can imagine my surprise if you've read the White Coat Investor, especially the beginning, that has absolutely nothing to do with Rich Dad, Poor Dad. So, I emailed back and here's what I said. “Thanks for your feedback. I'm not sure what book you're talking about exactly, but it sounds like you're referring to the original, the White Coat Investor book published in 2014. I was surprised to hear you felt it plagiarized Rich Dad, Poor Dad verbatim.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Over the last eight years, tens of thousands of people have read the book, many of whom have read Rich Dad, Poor Dad, and none has ever mentioned that or even felt plagiarized, much less was verbatim plagiarized. Nor Mr. Kiyosaki nor his representatives reached out either.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Looking at both books myself, I have no idea what you're talking about, but if you can be more specific about the plagiarized section, I'll take a look and see if something should be changed to avoid even the appearance of plagiarism. I certainly have no desire to plagiarize anyone's work. And if it occurred, it certainly was not intentional.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
At any rate, feel free to avoid taking any of my advice and to report me to whoever you feel I should be reported to. It would be best to direct them to our intellectual property attorney who can be reached here.” Then I provided contact information.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
The next email I get back says, “Never mind. This was a mistake that I would have to take a very long time to explain. I sincerely apologize.” Of course, that piqued my curiosity. And the next email comes in again from this doc. “Actually, I will humble myself to you completely and tell you what I believe happened is that I was reading Rich Dad, Poor Dad. And at some point, picked up your book and flipped through it. I am on nights and exhausted, and I believe just confused where I read what. When I went back to pick up your book, I recognized that I already read it, attributed it to the book I just finished.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
I'm incredibly dumb and obviously need a different outlet for my anger. Residency has done this to me. I'm really sorry, and deserve to walk away from this encounter with my tail between my legs and my head held low. I'm now continuing to read your book and find it extraordinarily helpful. I thought you deserved more of an apology after my tirade. Thanks for your understanding and patience.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
So, I emailed back. “This might be my favorite email exchange ever. Thanks for sharing the backstory. Apology accepted, and hopefully, our work can be of service to you going forward. At any rate, hang in there. This too shall pass. If you continue to pay attention to this financial stuff, there will come a time when you no longer work nights nor work when you are exhausted. It's awesome. Thank you for the work you're doing. It's important.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
And then finally an email back. “Oh, same. I've told this story to multiple people who now rightfully think I am deeply absurd. I now will be the number one advocate of your book, both because of its contents and your kindness. Thank you again.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
It's a funny exchange, but it does demonstrate just how hard it is to manage all this financial stuff when you're trying to keep all the other balls in your life afloat while working nights and being exhausted and having all the stresses of practicing medicine. It's hard work out there. So, if nobody has thanked you for your hard work today, let me be the first.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
All right. I have a new book out. You may have heard about this. It's The White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection. I think it's fantastic. I reviewed it on the blog the other day. You can find that on the blog. You can just go to the menu up top on the blog and under Books, you'll find a link to it. It'll tell you all about the book.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
I think it's very helpful for any mid-career or late-career docs. Anybody who's been sued, worried about being sued, thinking about asset protection, it's a great book. It's got all the information you need written in a manner that you can understand it. And most importantly, contains a listing of all the state-specific asset protection laws that you need to know about. You don't need to read all 50 states, but you do need to read the ones for your state and any state that you own property or do business in. And it's the best resource I know to do that. So, check that out. It's available on Amazon. It's the White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
If you'd like to be on this podcast, we'd like to have you on the podcast. The best way to do that is to leave us a SpeakPipe message. This is where you record a message up to a minute and a half. You don't have to use the whole thing, but basically, ask us a question and we'll answer it on the podcast. You can do that at whitecoatinvestor.com/speakpipe.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
All right, we've got a great guest on today. This is a guest that I had readers and listeners email me and request that I get on the podcast. And so, I thought it would be an interesting conversation. It might be a little more belligerent than a lot of the conversations I've had on the podcast. We'll see how it goes. I'm looking forward to it. And let's get our guest on the line.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
All right. My guest today is Jeffrey W. Ross MD, MBA. He is the founder of Vailshire Capital Management and Vailshire Partners hedge fund. He was a speaker at the Bitcoin 2022 Conference, and he is a board-certified radiologist. He's an interventional radiologist fellowship-trained, actually just retired last year in 2021. He has contributed to the Motley Fool as well as Seeking Alpha. Welcome to the White Coat Investor podcast, Jeff.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Thanks, Jim. Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, you've got a connection with one of our WCI network partners, Dr. Dalene. Tell us a little bit about that connection.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Yeah. Ironically, Leif and I, we went to the same college, and then we also went to the same medical school, the University of Minnesota. And so, we had very similar projections in our lives. We both were interested in finance as it turns out. And obviously, he did what he does. He does his Physicians on FIRE organization. And I created Vailshire back in 2013 because I've just always been a big fan of investing as well and teaching others how to invest wisely. So, yeah, we have very similar, almost like a parallel life that we're leading. It's pretty fun. He's a great guy.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Awesome. Well, let's talk about your upbringing and how it influenced your views on money. Obviously, at this point, you have a lot of interest in finance, but tell us about how that occurred.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. Even as a kid, I was always interested in investing. My mom always used to play things on the radio, teaching how to save and invest wisely and things like that. Even from an early age, it's been ingrained in my mind. When I got to college, I was interested in both investing and becoming a doctor. As we all know, you have to make that decision and it's a big choice. So, I chose medicine. I went down the pre-med route.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That whisked me away from anything finance and investing for a very long period. So med school, and then did my residency in radiology. And then I did a fellowship in interventional radiology, finished all of my training in 2008, and my family and I moved out to Colorado right after that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Within 6 to 12 months, I remembered that I love investing and I always had it as a hobby. About then, I had a little bit more free time finally, working in private practice. And I started a blog teaching people how to invest on their own.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
After doing that for a couple of years, I got picked up by the Motley Fool and Seeking Alpha writing investment advisory articles for them. I was kind of a stock-picking guy, focused on healthcare and technology. Then I had enough of a following of people who said, “Hey, we love the way you do things. Could you invest my money for me? I don't want to do this myself.” And I was like, “Oh, no, I'm just a doctor. I just do this for fun.” But it planted a seed in my brain and I thought, “Well, man, if I could do this for a living, that would be kind of fun.” So, Vailshire was born out of that as a side gig thing.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Fast forward a little bit, 2013, I founded Vailshire. 2014, I started managing the hedge fund called Vailshire Partners. It started out as basically a stock-picking value-oriented healthcare and technology fund, long-short fund. About eight months later, I started managing separately managed accounts. So, IRAs for clients and brokerage accounts, things like that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
A few years later, I got my MBA in finance. I did everything backwards. I started as a doctor and worked my way backwards. By the time I got to 2021, I had been doing both things for seven, eight years, two careers. It was pretty intense as you know, managing two different jobs. But I was able to retire from medicine in 2021, which was fantastic. And I've been doing just Vailshire since that time.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, you're still young. I mean, you're not that far out of residency since 2008. You spent a long time learning to be a doctor. Was there any reason you left medicine other than the fact that being a hedge fund manager pays a lot better?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Well, that's one fallacy. Being a famous hedge fund manager does pay better. My salary has dropped substantially since I just moved to Vailshire. I was doing pretty well as a private practice interventional radiologist, and I was a partner in our group. It's funny because a lot of people say this to me. “Hey, I was in medicine” and you know this as well. I went pre-med back in 1994. And so, from 1994 to 2021, medicine consumed my life. I loved it. I really enjoyed IR. I enjoyed being a radiologist. I enjoyed the patient interactions.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I didn't love the call. Admittedly, I didn't like being on call every fourth night and I didn't like it when my pager went off at 2:00 in the morning. And then other things I could not shake the feeling that I was just a cog in the healthcare system and I could not fix it the way I wanted to. And it was very frustrating. I didn't like arguing with health insurance companies. I couldn't stand the rising costs that were affecting our patients as you know. I'm the guy that does the biopsies and says, “Oh, shoot. It looks like you might have cancer.” And then I see these patients and I'm putting the chest ports in for chemotherapy, things like that and or doing cryoablation therapy for some tumor or something.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
They're telling me about their hospital bills costing $50,000, $100,000, $200,000. And they're kind of looking at me accusingly like I'm the one causing these rising healthcare costs and it's frustrating. And it's sad. I see those rising costs and all of the inefficiencies in the system as well, the bureaucracy of it all. All of the middlemen, all of the administrators, all of that stuff was very frustrating for me.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And so, I used to talk about this with my partners and I'd think, “Man, if I could just get out and just do finance for a living, it'd be a way better quality of life. I wouldn't feel so bad about being a part of this healthcare system.” I obviously love it. Obviously, I chose my career and went down that path. So, I'm not anti-healthcare. I'm not anti-MDs at all. But there are problems that need to be fixed and some problems may never be fixed in our lifetime. Anyways, it was actually a relief when I finally did retire. I don't regret it at all. I felt like I put in a good time and I'm ready for part two of my life in the next career.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Awesome. Thanks for sharing that. I wonder how many docs listening to this podcast are thinking, “Wow, I wonder if I could be a hedge fund manager.” I bet there's somebody that would be inspired to try something similarly. Do you have any advice to somebody that's thinking about exiting medicine into the financial world?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I will tell you that you surmise correctly. I get probably five doctors a week on average who reach out to me and say that they are thinking really strongly about a plan B. They're frustrated with medicine or for whatever reason they're thinking about moving on to something else. And could they be a hedge fund manager or could they move into finance and what do I do?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, I just tell them, you got to follow your passion. If you want to do this, first, I say, don't give up your day job. It is really hard to find the kind of income you get from medicine. You're highly specialized. You're very good at what you do. You get paid very well. This is not how the rest of the world works. You do not get a job that pays like a physician being a rookie at Fidelity or working at a bank or something like that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So don't quit your day job. Think of it as a side gig, if you want to do it. Look into what specifically you are interested in. Not everybody is cut out to be a hedge fund manager. It's different personalities for every different kind of specialty in medicine and in finance as well. So, think about what you really would want to do. Start doing some work, start publishing your work.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think the easiest way for people, if you want to kind of follow my route, is to start writing articles, and start trying to get published on a place like Seeking Alpha, which is pretty easy. They're pretty inclusive and they allow a lot of people to come on and publish things. You'll find out quickly if you're good or not at that. Because if you write a bad article, you'll get mocked and ridiculed. You're either going to learn from it from getting humbled or you're going to get better. And so, if you still have a passion for that after a couple of years, then yeah, maybe think about managing money for a living.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, your fund has made a bit of a transition. When you started, it was primarily picking stocks, as you mentioned, healthcare and tech stocks. And in more recent years, you've specialized a bit more in crypto assets. Tell us a little bit about that transition.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. Just being a guy in finance, I'm always looking for the best sharp ratio. Risk-adjusted returns, and being kind of interested in technology, to begin with. That was an easy segue into the whole crypto universe. So, it was back in about 2015 or 2016, where I first got introduced to this space.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
This is all outside of Vailshire, by the way. At first, it was just me trying to sort this stuff out. I got into first Bitcoin back in 2016-ish, and then started getting into all of these other altcoins over the ensuing years. So, I wrote up that big ramp-up that everybody remembers. It was a huge parabolic, moved higher in 2017. I thought I was a genius. Everybody did. People were dropping and quitting their jobs to become full-time crypto traders. Things like that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Every crypto that came out was talking about being the next and the better Bitcoin, things like that. And so, you basically couldn't lose. You could be a monkey and you could throw a dart at any crypto and you would make a lot of money. It would go up 5X or 10X or 100X for some people.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
But then came the reality. 2017, at the end of 2017, we had these highs. Bitcoin almost hit $20,000, and then began crypto winter. Early 2018, everything started to fall. Most of these cryptos that I had owned. The funny story for me, especially if you know how I am now, my persuasion now, I used to own a lot of Bitcoin. I sold all of that to buy all of these other cryptos that I thought might be shinier and better than Bitcoin. They crashed very hard.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
By 2018, I had taken some profits. In 2017 by 2018, my altcoin, all of those things that I own, this whole portfolio dropped by about 90% to 95%. And I got hit with just a gigantic tax bill in 2018 for my gains in 2017, those short-term capital games. Huge lesson learned. It was intense. And I didn't like it. And I checked out of it for the next several months.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Early in 2019, I fell down the proverbial rabbit hole of Bitcoin and did basically a deep dive into it. And what makes Bitcoin different? If it's such a terrible technology and if it's just a tulip craze, why hasn't it gone away? Why does it keep sticking around? And what is it that makes it different? So, I spent a lot of time early 2019 studying Bitcoin itself. And then I started educating my Vailshire clients on that as well. And we started getting our portfolios into there.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And basically, we had no Bitcoin exposure to by kind of mid-2019, we had about half of my clients in just a little bit of exposure and those who didn't. Into 2020, I was able to show my clients. A lot of my clients were very reluctant to own any of it, because they're kind of scared of it. They read the headlines, they thought, “Well, it's used by criminals. Well, it wastes energy. The government's going to shut it down.” Those kinds of things, the common narratives you hear, but I was able to show them. And mainly that it's too volatile.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I said, “Well, here's what just a 1% allocation to Bitcoin in our portfolio. Here's the exact same Vailshire portfolio with no Bitcoin. Look at the difference. There's not an increase in volatility, but we're seeing a significant increase in performance.” And so, that's how I started getting my clients into it and have been educating them ever since.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's my story of how I got into it. I'm basically now focused primarily on Bitcoin. I spend a lot of time teaching people about the difference between Bitcoin and crypto, even though Bitcoin is the original crypto. And in the common day, the modern-day parlance does not equate with what crypto is. So, I think there's big distinctions. And we can talk about that if you want to.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's do that. Let's talk about this dramatic difference you see between Bitcoin and other crypto-assets and cryptocurrencies Cardano, Solana, Ethereum, etc. Why is Bitcoin special?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. So, Bitcoin is just simply better money. That's all it is. Bitcoin exists to be the antithesis of government Fiat currency. There are many reasons why, but basically Bitcoin is decentralized, whereas government Fiat obviously is centralized. It's run by the Federal Reserve. It has these unknown policies that we wait every six weeks to hear what the Fed is going to say to what the current policy is. Are they going to tighten? Are they going to ease? Are they going to print more? Are they going to start selling off assets? Things like that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Back in 2017, 2018, when I was involved with it initially, I didn't know the difference. There was a big battle for what would be the new currency or the new money of the internet. And I would say the new world's money for the digital age. The battle was between Bitcoin and then Bitcoin Cash, BSV, Litecoin. All of these other things that are basically the same type of proof of work protocol as Bitcoin, who could be the best, decentralize the most secure money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I didn't know at the time. Being totally honest, I had a basket of all those because I had no idea what would win. And in fact, I sold all my Bitcoin because I thought, well, maybe it's going to be one of these, maybe Litecoin. The silver to Bitcoin's gold will end up being the best one.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you look from, and in fact, I did this just before we got on this podcast here. Over the last five years, all of those currencies at best are down 65% to Bitcoin, and the worst ones are down about 98%. So, to me, the world has clearly chosen Bitcoin as the primary currency for the digital age. Now, that's different than all the other altcoins, the whole crypto world. So, Ethereum, Cardano, Solana. All these other things, totally different.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
These are technology platforms that are basically trying to be multi-functional base layer protocols to do all of these things that people like to do. So smart contracts, speculation, arts, gaming, entertainment. All of that kind of stuff, that is great for what these things do. They are not meant to be money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
There was a false narrative going around for a while that Ethereum is ultrasound money. Bitcoin is sound money. Ethereum is ultrasound money. That's not what Ethereum was designed to do. It's basically a technology platform or technology protocol. I like to say from a snarky point of view, it's basically venture capital technology, venture capital that's loosely or awkwardly glued to the blockchain.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
A lot of the stuff that they do, you don't need the blockchain for. It's just kind of the thing that's super popular right now. The Metaverse, Web3, all of this talk. That's all crypto and it's totally different from just Bitcoin, which is simply better money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So that's how I categorize the two. I think I have backing with that view because Gary Gensler, the chair of the SCC, clearly states basically Bitcoin. He sees it I think as simply better money, it's just decentralized non-governmental money. All of this other stuff, he views basically as unregistered securities.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
They have centralization, even though they talk about being decentralized, DeFi – Decentralized Finance. They basically are centralized protocols. They have a head, they have founders. They're built on the proof of stake system, which is similar to how stocks are done. Whoever owns the most controls the protocol the most and gets to make the decisions.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
It tends to lead to a “rich get richer” kind of thing because they can sort of put up, they can stake their larger stakes to earn more interest and increase their stakes. Totally different from the whole proof of work protocol of Bitcoin. So, two totally separate things. I think Gary Gensler sees that. I think that regulations, legislation is going to see that over time. And it starts with the SCC. I think we're going to see that over the next couple of years.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, it's interesting. You talk about Bitcoin as money. Back in, I don't know the first time I heard about it, 2011 probably, people talked about Bitcoin being a currency. Now I talk to people and most of them admit, “Okay, it's really not working out as a currency. I'm justifying it by it being a store of value.” Or they just freely admit, “I'm speculating on it. I think I'll be able to sell it later for more.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
But I feel like in the beginning, the idea was that it was a currency, a currency we'd actually be using in our day-to-day lives. And over the last decade-plus, that hasn't really panned out. I'm still not using Bitcoin as currency. I'm not buying gas with it. I'm not buying pizza with it. I'm not using it to move money around between my accounts. Why aren't we yet using Bitcoin as currency? What happened? How could so many people be so wrong about that?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's a great question. Well, I would caveat that to say that people are so far sort of wrong, but they will be right eventually. Bitcoin, the way that money always gets decided by a society going all the way back to… I mean, you can go back thousands of years when people used to use seashells or limestone rocks as currency or gold and silver, things like that. It starts out as a collectible, and then it becomes a store of value. People start to see that it's more than just a collectible. This thing actually holds value and increases in value over time.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's the same thing that happened with all of these other kinds of things. And that's what I think is going on with Bitcoin as well. As that gets more solidified and the world sort of starts to settle on this as this being kind of a primary functional store of value, it becomes more of a medium of exchange.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And that's because what needs to happen for this, for Bitcoin specifically is you need the infrastructure to be built out for it to become a medium of exchange. And I know you probably know all this. You know about Lightning. The Lightning Network is getting more popular.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you were paying attention to the Bitcoin conference recently in April in Miami, Jack Mallers has recently, through his company called Strike, has partnered with the organizations that do the scanners that you go to. So, check-out lane scanners. When you put your credit card in there, right now it has the choices “Do you want to use Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express?”

Dr. Jeff Ross:
This year, before this year is over at most major retailers, Starbucks, McDonald's, Walmart, all of these huge players who use this technology, the fifth option is going to be Bitcoin. It's already done, this deal. So, they're starting to implement that and put it out.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So pretty soon over the Lightning Network, you will be able to make transactions. And you can do that any way you want. It's just using the Bitcoin network itself. You can pay with US dollars that then quickly gets converted to Bitcoin, and then back to the retailer as dollars, or you can pay with Bitcoin, and you can do this around the world. I could make a transaction right now to South America, in some country. Pick a country, pick a person, and I could do it instantly without permission and with basically a less than a penny fee to make that transaction.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
To me, that's very revolutionary, but we're still in the awkward early phases where it's getting built out. The infrastructure isn't quite there yet, but for those of us who are in the industry, we see it coming. To me, it's very similar to where the internet was in about the late 1990s where personally, I didn't get it early enough. I thought, “Well, that's kind of cool. I can send an email to somebody. And I like it when it makes the little ping sound like I got mail.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
But it seemed awkward. And it was clunky. And I'm like, “What is this ever going to be used for? There's some dude named Jeff Bezos that's going to say you can buy books. I would never give my credit card to the internet.” That's the phase we're in right now with Bitcoin, I believe. It's really hard unless you're a visionary to see what the internet would become 15, 20 years from the year 2000. I think we're at that same awkward, clunky early phase of Bitcoin as well where it's going to become so much bigger and ubiquitous than it is right now.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And if I could just a quick tangent, because this is how I look at Bitcoin for the growth of Bitcoin, and the pricing of Bitcoin is based on the adoption. User adoption. It's based on this theory called Metcalfe's law, which is basically the value of the network is based on the number of users squared. And so, the internet and things like cell phone usage and personal computers, all those things, they all follow this S-curve of adoption, which on a logarithmic scale looks like this.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin is following that exact same schedule. In fact, it's actually a little faster than internet adoption was. That's why I say the 1990s. We're kind of about the late 1990s phase for adoption of Bitcoin. But it's actually growing faster than the internet and a little bit faster than cell phone adoption. So, if you put a price tag onto that, you can see the price projection of Bitcoin over time. And that's what I use to value Bitcoin.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
You think we're just too early?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Yes. I think we're early.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
We're too early to judge that it's not working out as a currency. You think we'll overcome the speed issues, the energy use issues, the volatility of it as a currency. You think that'll all be overcome and we'll actually be using it as a currency to buy our gasoline, etc.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I do. I absolutely believe that. And I think as the methods for it being a medium of exchange become much more easy and more ubiquitous, we won't even think about it anymore. It'll be as easy as giving a credit card to a machine or tapping our credit card. We'll be doing that with Bitcoin. And I think that we'll actually see that within a year.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Right now, getting to your point as a unit of account, it's very volatile. That's good if you're an owner, the volatility. It is very volatile, but it's more volatile to the upside over time. So, the sharpe ratio is still just incredibly impressive. There is volatility for sure. As it gets bigger, the law of large numbers, it gets harder for it to have these huge, massive fluctuations.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
We will reach a point eventually where it gets to be so big. It gets to be like, I think a worldwide currency that sort of size, in the tens of trillions of dollars. And then the volatility will substantially decrease. It will become a much better unit of account at that point.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
One other point is that right now by the IRS it's treated as property. So, it gets taxed like property. Every time you make a transaction, if you sell Bitcoin to buy something, it's a taxable event. And so, that's an issue as well.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think at some point, and it's already happening in some small countries right now, but I think in the US this will happen probably by the end of this decade where it will be treated also as a currency from a tax perspective as well. That will change things too. If I can just pay for things and not trigger taxable events, I think the use case of it would significantly increase at that point.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Yeah. That's certainly another barrier, the taxation of it. I haven't run the numbers, but it seems to me the volatility isn't decreasing. It's been 10, 12 years. It's not getting less volatile yet, but you think at some point something's going to happen that makes it less volatile.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Yes. First of all, if you are thinking of it as a long-term investment, you don't want it to decrease in volatility. That's basically when the gains have been significantly squeezed out of it, if it turns into more of like a blue-chip stock or the US dollar, that's when we've already gotten way up here on the adoption curve. And it's much less interesting as a kind of a life-changing investment sort of thing.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
But much more useful as a currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Much more useful. Exactly. The gains will decrease over time, but use cases will increase over time. So, it's good and bad. That'll be a great thing though, for the world at that point. And why would it be a good thing? Because Bitcoin is a disinflationary currency. That's the monetary policy. It's a perfectly scarce asset that will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin as you know, versus the US dollar.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Mathematically, the US dollar Neel Kashkari, one of the FOMC guys, he's not currently a voting member, but he's very outspoken. He has said publicly, we have the ability to print the US dollar infinitely. And as we know from math class, if you can print something to infinity, the value of each individual unit goes towards zero over time. All Fiat currencies literally go to zero over time historically. That's just a mathematical certainty.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If Bitcoin continues just to be adopted on schedule as it is, and it's perfectly scarce, the value just increases infinitely over time. I'm not saying it goes to infinity, but it increases over time just with the growth of the world and the growth of productivity throughout the world. So it will be, I think, basically an ever-expanding price point for Bitcoin over the long run.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk about your long-term predictions for Bitcoin performance and let's talk in terms of probabilities. Maybe each of the three following possibilities. The first is that 10 or 20 years from now, Bitcoin is worth dramatically more, let's say $500,000, a million dollars or more per Bitcoin. A large amount. Big, huge gain.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
The second possibility is that it's worth something similar to what it's worth now in 10 or 20 years. It's still worth a five-figure amount. And the third is that Bitcoin goes to zero. What probabilities would you assign to each of those possible outcomes?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Well, you're probably not going to like this. You're going to think I'm crazy, but I would say for the first option that it's going to be at least $500,000 to a million 10-plus years from now. I would assign a 90% probability of that. I would assign probably 9% to that it would be flat. I think it's almost a 0% chance that it goes to zero. So, I'll give it a 1% chance that it goes to zero.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
The only thing that would make me concerned about Bitcoin, I used to have tons of concerns. I was as skeptical as anybody in the beginning. My biggest concern back in 2018, 2019, was that the US government was going to see it as a threat and shut it down.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
It could have been shut down by the US or by China. They could have put up the energy stack in order to do a 51% attack and they could have done things to try to crush it. They could have pulled a China and said, “All Bitcoin miners are banned. It's illegal to own Bitcoin. If you own Bitcoin, we'll throw you in jail.” They could have done all that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
But something happened. From the Trump administration to the Biden administration, they switched from being adversarial, they've noticeably to me have come to the conclusion that we can't do anything to stop this. So, what we need to do is keep our fingers in it. We need to regulate it. We need to tax it. We got to flush out the criminals and the criminal activity. Make it hard for them to operate, but we can't stop it.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And so, I don't see, basically, at this point, any chance realistically that it goes to zero. The bigger concern would be, “Do people just quit adopting it? Do they think dogecoin got better monetary properties? The world's going to choose that instead, because Elon loves it, and so do we, or Shiba Inu or whoever, just pick some random thing.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think the likelihood of that is extremely low because the world is already deciding. And I think the main reason, Jim, is because most of those other currencies, those other cryptos, focus on what you're talking about, the medium of exchange. They want to be an easy medium of exchange. So, they increase the ability, the capacity of the network to make lots of transactions on their base layer.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
The downside of doing that is that it cannot be as decentralized when you do that. It actually becomes more centralizing over time. Instead of spreading the power of the money, the monetary network out to the people across the world and making it very easy to run a node, they make it harder to do that. So, it makes it more centralized. The bigger players tend to accumulate more of it and they get to set the monetary policy over time.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin has those features. We do not need a better medium of exchange in the world. The US dollar is a fantastic medium of exchange. Credit cards are just fantastic. They're super easy. They're super quick. Merchants don't like credit cards because they get the fee of 3% plus 50 cents of each transaction every time you swipe a card.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
All of those things, we just literally have thousands of medium of exchange options. That will come for sure with Bitcoin. In fact, it already is coming on layer two and it will come even more on the third layer. But what we desperately need is a store of value. We have government Fiat currencies that are literally designed to depreciate and value over time. Meaning that we lose our purchasing power year after year. We see prices of everything rising over time.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
The monetary policy of Bitcoin literally, it turns it on its head. It's the exact opposite. It will make life cheaper over time. And so, the longer you hold US dollars, the more expensive life gets. But the longer you hold Bitcoin, the cheaper life gets over the long run. That's why I'm such a big proponent of it.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, despite being a big proponent, I understand your fund was short Bitcoin earlier this year. Are you still short Bitcoin as we record this in mid-May, 2022? I think it's down 50% percent from its peak right now. Are you still short?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's a funny rumor. I've never shorted Bitcoin but people tell me that a lot. So, I'm not quite sure what they're talking about. In my fund though, I have things I call Bitcoin proxies. So, if you can't own Bitcoin outright, you can own things that are proxies to them. Bitcoin miners, crypto exchanges, like coin-based, things like that. Ethereum, you can own the Grayscale Ethereum product as well. Just like the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. I do short those things.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I say this sort of jokingly. When I'm concerned about a drawdown coming for the price of Bitcoin, I'm happy to short Ethereum or I'm happy to short Coinbase. I do those kinds of things. So, I do short proxies. Right now, I'm not short of any of those things. I'm actually short more equity markets, I'm short technology stocks, NASDAQ, innovation type stocks, things like that, which has been helpful. But I'm long Bitcoin. I have a hold forever core position of Bitcoin.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
How do you decide whether to be long or short on these Bitcoin proxies?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
In my hedge fund, this is how I think through these kinds of things. I have some assets that I view as hold forever assets. Sort of a Warren Buffet type approach. I just hold them. I don't care if they go up and down. I try to buy them when they're cheaper, hopefully, new cash comes in when it's cheaper. So, I can increase our funds' allocation to them. It's not worth selling them. These are just fantastic companies that I think are going to be bigger, better, worth a lot more, and provide shareholder value for the next 5, 10 and 20 years. I have a core allocation to those sorts of things.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Other things, the other half of my portfolio essentially, I call it momentum trades. These are things that are kind of heavy on innovation. They tend to be high beta assets. A lot of them are sort of in the crypto Bitcoin infrastructure space. Those are where the proxies come in. So micro strategy, lots of Bitcoin miners, exchanges, things like that. And then others like tech stocks. Shopify is a good example of that. Shopify is down 75%, or 80%, from its highest. Thankfully we stepped out of that and we haven't had that fall. I buy those when they're in a bullish trend and when they hit a trailing stop, I sell them and we wait until a new bullish trend starts again.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
To your point, Bitcoin has been down, it's down over 50% from its highs. This year, it's been not performing well, but it's not too terrible compared to the Bitcoin proxies. MicroStrategy is getting destroyed. Bitcoin miners, some of them are down 70%, 80%, 90%. Those are getting to be so, so cheap. I'm just personally very excited. The way my system works is it waits for a bottom. It confirms a bottom based on momentum strategies. And when it turns back into a bullish mode, we'll buy back into those.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk a little bit about the hedge funds space. Now hedge funds typically charge 2 and 20, 2% of assets under management per year, plus 20% of profits. And of course, index mutual fund investors view that as highway robbery, because they're used to paying just a few basis points for management.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
A couple of questions. One about the industry in general, and another about you in particular. About the industry in general, what's the justification for charging those fees? And about you in particular, you actually charge less. You don't charge an annual fee. You charge 20% of profits above a high watermark. And I'm curious why you chose not to do what the industry does.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. The 2 and 20 comes from just the historical precedent that was set when hedge funds first came out. Back in the day in the 1960s, 1970s, even the 1980s, there were very few hedge funds. The hedge funds were doing things that most market participants didn't do or couldn't do. And they killed it. They made some fantastic returns. That's how they justified their fee structure of the 2 and 20.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That to me is highway robbery. Charging that amount of money to a client, I don't know how those people sleep at night, but they do. And for the ones who maybe kill it and they make far outpace the returns of the S&P 500 overtime, far outperform what you could do just holding Vanguard low fee index funds, maybe the fee structure is worth it.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
There are tens of thousands of hedge funds now. I would say almost none of them can perform the way they used to be able to when they were the only game in town, back in the '60s, '70s, '80s. So, I don't think that's a reasonable fee structure anymore. They see the same fee structure in venture capital as well.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
My hope was to be like how I was when I was a doctor. I just wanted to be a good guy in a frustrating world. So, healthcare gets maligned for lots of reasons, but there are tons of good doctors that are just literally trying to do the best for their patients. I have the same approach with finance. I wanted to be sort of a good guy trying to help people in kind of a bad guy world. Wall Street is very malign and for good reason. It exists to fleece people. It's sort of a middleman to take your money, even though you think you're going to make money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, my fee structure. Obviously, I started with that narrative of 2 and 20. I actually initially founded Vailshire Partners, the fund, and I started it with a 1 and 20 fee structure. And I literally couldn't sleep at night. I'm like, I can't do this to people. I definitely can't do this to my family and friends who are probably going to be my first clients initially. That's how it kind of starts with the people you know. I just couldn't do it. And so, I'm like, “Okay, I'm going to charge no management fee, zero.” I have this 0% management fee and then a 20% incentive fee. That's kind of keeping in line with it.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Basically, the way I tell people is I don't make money unless you make money. Say I even lose money one year, I don't just have to start making money that next year. I don't start from that low point. I start from the high watermark at the end of the year where I have to exceed that in order to make any money. So, it's possible that I go one, two, three, four years without making any money if my clients don't make money from their initial investment.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That feels fair to me, and that's how I sell it to my clients, and my clients who are on board think that's great. They feel kind of good in a way when we have a bad year. They're like, “Well, at least I'm not paying any fees for this and he's doing his best. He must be hurting, poor guy, because he's not making any money at all.” And it's true. I'm just paying fees into the fund to keep it going. The administrative and legal fees and things like that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think that's a reasonable fee structure. I think it's fair. For my separately managed accounts, that's a different fee structure. It's more traditional. I charge 1% of assets under management for amounts under a million. And then I decrease the fee as the amounts go above a million. And those clients tend to think that's a reasonable fee structure as well. So yeah, that's how I do it. And I think it's different from how Wall Street does it, but I feel good about it and it helps me to sleep at night.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's turn the subject a little bit. A lot of my listeners are sitting out there going, “Well, how much of my portfolio do I put into Bitcoin, into other crypto assets?” What percentage of a portfolio do you think is reasonable to allocate to these sorts of assets?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. Here's how I feel about crypto. First of all, let's distinguish it again, Bitcoin and there's crypto. They're two separate things. Crypto itself, I view as basically pure speculation. I think of it as like venture capital, that's kind of awkwardly glued to a blockchain and it's marked to market 24/7, 365.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, what's fascinating about it is regular people, Joe and Shmoe investors that could not ever participate in venture capital, suddenly they can with the whole crypto world. And so, I think that's why they're going crazy with it. And then they're kind of excited about it, but there's lots of thrills to it. But it can also completely wipe you out and wreck you. I view that mostly as pure speculation.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
For every Ethereum that has done amazingly, there are literally 10 or 100 or more competitors that are coming for Ethereum's lunch. Ethereum is the pioneer of the multifunctional base layer, smart contracts, doing all that kind of stuff. But as everyone who uses Ethereum knows, it's getting very clunky. It's hard to use. It's super expensive. It's slowing down. It's having problems, and it's not as decentralized as people say.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Vitalik wants to switch it from proof of work to proof of steak. They've literally been talking about this for about six years and still have not done it. It's always about two months away, but never going through. And then there's Solana and there's Cardano. Pick whatever chain, they're coming for it. They're better, faster, stronger, everything. All the weaknesses of Ethereum, they can do these better. So, there's a chance that they could take over.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Why do I bring this up? Because nothing is permanent in the crypto world as far as I'm concerned. Even though the crypto space is probably going to expand over time. The individual names are going to be like lighting a match. They go up and then they go down and they go to zero or near zero I think over time. I think that's going to be the course of most of them.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, what do I tell people? They're pure speculations. If you want to speculate, that's your prerogative. If you want to go to Vegas and gamble money, totally your prerogative, go for it. You can speculate in whatever, but I recommend that you save in Bitcoin.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And so where does it fit with a portfolio? I would say either 0% for altcoins, or if you just think it's fun and you want to do this, and you think Web3 is amazing, and you think NFTs are going to be incredible, or the Metaverse is the next big thing, sure, chuck. But I would not put more than 1% or 2% of your net worth into anything like that unless you just have money to burn.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin is different. And again, I think of Bitcoin as savings. It's just simply better money. What I have seen from being in this space for many years now, is that the more you know Bitcoin the more you own Bitcoin, because you feel comfortable with it and you're comfortable with the volatility.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I've seen people who go up to 100% of their net worth completely in Bitcoin. I do not recommend that just to be very clear, but I will say that the more you own it, the more you're comfortable with it and the more you believe where it's going to go 5, 10, 20 years from now. In Vailshire as a case in point, we were all 0%. We got them off 0 to 1%. And then we went up to about 5%.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
For the people who have been in for years now and who understand it, they want to go 10%, 20%. Some of them want to go up to 50%. It's just kind of a comfort thing. For those people, I usually recommend that they start owning Bitcoin outside of their brokerage account, their IRAs, those kinds of things. Just buy Bitcoin separately, get it off the exchanges and hold it in cold storage yourself. That's what I recommend.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
It's a very personal decision for people. I view it as savings. And so, it just depends how much of your net worth you want to have in savings. It's a personal decision for everybody, but I'm comfortable going up even to as high as 50% for some people.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, you talk about speculative assets, speculation, etc. And by definition, Bitcoin as well is a speculative asset. It doesn't produce earnings. It doesn't pay rents. It doesn't pay dividends or interests. Any investment returns on it depend essentially on convincing someone else to pay more for it than you paid for it. And that keeps a lot of us from investing in it. Do you think it should? And if not, why not?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think there are four stages to understanding Bitcoin. I think the first stage is skepticism and mockery or just disbelief of what it is. I think phase two, step two is speculation. Stage three, I think, is as an investment or as a portfolio hedge. And I think stage four in the final stages, you just see it as better money as savings technology.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
A lot of people think Bitcoin is risky because it's volatile. And so, what I like to tell people is I think volatility only equals risk in academia. It's a made-up concept so that we can measure the volatility of an asset and put a name to it. I think what real risk is in finance is the chance of losing your purchasing power over time when you make an investment.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you're holding the US dollar, I think that is guaranteed to lose your purchasing power over time from a mathematical perspective and from a monetary policy perspective. I would say that's risky, but finance, the traditional finance, and MBA courses would say that it's not risky. It's a risk-free asset. Like the US treasury is a risk-free asset. I would say, you're guaranteed to lose your purchasing power if you hold that. And so therefore that makes it a risky asset.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
With that in mind, I think what's interesting about Bitcoin is that everything about its monetary policy is absolutely knowable. The only thing we don't know about it is its short-term price fluctuations. To me, that's super fascinating. We know exactly that every 10 minutes, there's going to be another tranche of Bitcoin released to a Bitcoin miner. We know that there only ever will be 21 million Bitcoins. We know that the last ones will be mine in about the year 2140. After that point, it will become a non-inflationary asset. It'll actually become slightly deflationary because if anybody loses their Bitcoin, they'll be a little bit less available.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, everything about its monetary policy is actually known. And for me, that dramatically takes away a risk. Coming full circle, Bitcoin is not a company to your point. It does not have cash flows. You can't treat it like it's a value stock. You can't do price to earnings, price of sales, discounted cash flow models. I get all of that. It's just simply better money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
This is what Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger get wrong as well. They talk about it like it's a stupid trendy tech stock, but it couldn't be further from the truth from what it actually is. It's just better money. And all it is, it’s just money that's the antithesis of government Fiat currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I don't see it as a speculation really. Could I be wrong? Sure. Could the world adopt a different kind of money for the digital age? Sure. I think that's extremely unlikely though. And so, I just would encourage people to not think of it like a stock or a company or talk about it like it is, but just think about it like what it really is, it’s just money.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk a little bit about valuing it. You had mentioned earlier some of the ways you value it. A lot of people, including me, find it difficult to value Bitcoin and thus hesitate to invest in it. For example, the only reasonable way I've really found a value is to look at the cost of producing a new one. Which is mostly an energy cost, something around $10,000, it's been estimated at. Then maybe add on some infrastructure staffing and security costs, but even doing that and even after this most recent 50% drop in Bitcoin, it's still dramatically overvalued. How do you decide when Bitcoin is overvalued or undervalued?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I alluded to this earlier, but the way I look at Bitcoin, I use valuation models that are based on Metcalfe's law. Based on demand and adoption of the technology. You can actually fit the curves like we talked about. When a new technology is basically world-changing and it becomes ubiquitous around the world, it follows an S-shaped adoption curve.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Right now, Bitcoin is right at that bottom part and near the inflection point of the S-shaped adoption curve. You can actually figure out those curves from a mathematical perspective and create formulas that look at what the price should be. You can stick a price onto the adoption rate of Bitcoin, similar to what you could do for cell phones and the internet. They're all following that exact same curve of adoption. The only caveat is Bitcoin is actually getting adopted a little bit faster than the internet was and a little faster than cell phone adoption was as well.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
When you put a price tag on that, you can find an expected base price of what Bitcoin should be over time based on the number of users who are using it. And that has actually followed this curve, ironically, or not since about the year 2011. And so, that's how I value it. There can be variations in how you create those equations, but they're all basically about the same.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
What does that say to me? We talk about is Bitcoin overvalued? Actually, right now with this drawdown, it's almost right along the baseline of that adoption curve. This is a point where I would call it a strong buy. I'll go out just a little bit based on these curves, the curves that I look at, and how I view this for its adoption, because the adoption isn't slowing down, it continues to go at a really impressive pace.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
When you put a price tag to that, I have an end-of-the-year 2022 conservative price target of $50,000 for Bitcoin, that actually doubles to $100,000 or around there at the end of 2023. And then you can sort of extend that out and it depends what sort of growth rate you use.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think that from here a reasonable CAGR, compounded annual growth rate for Bitcoin is somewhere between 45% and 75% for the next decade. 45% would actually be much slower than it was last decade. But more in line with a conservative user adoption for worldwide adoption of this technology. Hopefully, that makes sense. But those are the kind of curves that I look at to determine what price it should be.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Of course, we haven't seen the whole curve. We don't know that it's actually going to follow that curve. Does that bother you at all? That at some point it may drop off and not do that S-shaped curve?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That is the risk. There is a risk that people could suddenly say, “Hey, you know what? Bitcoin sucks. I don't believe in it anymore and we're going to adopt something else.” Or to my point earlier, Shiba Inu or some other thing is going to be the new world's currency. I just don't buy that anymore. I think that battle was fought and decided in 2017 and 2018. And Bitcoin has, to me, become the clear winner for the world's currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Basically, the only way for this to not happen would be just for people to lose interest in it, for adoption to completely drop off. I think that's really unlikely, but it is a possibility. I just think it's very unlikely.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, crypto-assets are notoriously difficult to understand compared to a lot of traditional investments. Some of its fans suggest you need to spend at least 1,000 hours studying it to understand it. Yet, the old investing adage is “Don't invest in anything you don't understand.” Should we avoid Bitcoin and these crypto-assets, if we're not willing to spend a thousand hours studying it?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Well, you can probably guess my answer to this. For crypto assets, for everything X Bitcoin, I would say, yeah, I would avoid it because it's just pure speculation. At least that's how I view it. And it's very hard to understand.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
You can get a feeling for the industry and where it's going and the possibilities of it, but to try to understand an individual altcoin and what their protocol stands for and what it's actually going to do and how it actually provides value, I think that's extremely difficult. So, I would tell people, yeah, I probably would avoid it. That's my policy as well. I tend to avoid all other altcoin assets.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin I do understand it, obviously, at a pretty deep level. I try to keep it simple for people. I think you can grasp it in 10 seconds. If I say it's just basically money, it's better money. Why is it better money? Because it's the opposite of what the US dollar is. It's the opposite of government Fiat currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And if people can click with that, if they sort of click with, “I don't like inflation, I don't like it that my groceries go up every year in price. I don't like how much healthcare has increased in price.” I have college-age kids now. The same college I went to back in the 1990s, the current college is four times more expensive now than it was when I was there.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's what I talk to my kids about. “Do you think the quality of the education has gone up four times since I was there?” I mean, I think it's probably gone down maybe slightly since then the way other things are going, but it's four times more expensive. And that's what inflation is. That's what the devaluing of the dollar does to us. It makes life more and more expensive. It keeps us kind of enslaved to the system where we're borrowing money, where we have to keep working to pay off our debts.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And it puts people like you and me in business where we can tell people about investing and tell people about wise borrowing strategies and getting out of debt and how to invest in real estate and all these other kinds of things. Tax strategies. Most of this industry will not need to exist in a Bitcoin standard world I think, because when you have a disinflation currency and things tend to get cheaper over time, all you really need to do is work hard and save.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And if you have money that is actually appreciating your purchasing power over time versus depreciating your purchasing power over time, there's really nothing more to do for your kids, for your family, for future generations than to simply just save it and hold on to it.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let me push back a little bit about this idea because I hear it a lot. That Bitcoin is this protection against inflation. We're now in the most inflationary environment we've seen since the early 1980s. Inflation is measured by CPIs at about 9% right now, and has ramped up dramatically over the last six months. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has dropped 50% in value. It doesn't feel at least over this short time period that it's protecting me from inflation in any way, shape, or form. How would you respond to that?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Sure. I would say that you have to take a step back. Markets just don't work like that. There's not a one-to-one short-term correlation between things like inflation pops up. So, inflation goes up. Inflation is down. Money printing is up, therefore the stocks are up. Money printing is down, stocks are down.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
It's not like that in the short-term. Markets just vary because of a million different reasons from day-to-day. If you back up though, and look at the longer term, I just popped up while you were saying that. Bitcoin in the last five years is actually up 1644% relative to the US dollar. I think that's pretty good inflation protection. I think it gets in the millions of percent if you look back 10 years. It's clearly appreciating relative to the US dollar.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Do I think that will continue at that rate going forward? No. The first year it was this brand-new asset so people piled into it. We're not going to have 1000X gains anytime in the near future. But do I think it continues to basically appreciate in value mathematically the same way that the US dollar depreciates in value over the long run? Absolutely.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
And one more case in point, the US dollar is very strong right now. It's just crushing other currencies. It's spiking, the DXY is spiking right now. The Japanese Yen is crashing. Other currencies look very weak compared to the strength of the US dollar. Just because the US dollar is strong right now doesn't mean it's a strong currency that you would want to hold forever. You're guaranteed to lose your purchasing power if you hold it over the long term, but in the short-term it's increasing.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
So, the same thing, flip that on its head, Bitcoin is down in the short term. Yes, it's down 50% or even more since its recent high, but over the long run, again, it's like a programmed mathematical certainty to increase in value. So, I think it's actually a fantastic inflation hedge over the long run.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk a little bit about worldview. Crypto proponents, both online and in real life, have an almost religious conviction and sometimes a unique worldview. Not that different from gold bugs, not that different from preppers in some ways.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
For example, I had someone trying to convince me a couple of weeks ago that Bitcoin is going to eliminate war from the world. What are your thoughts on this semi-religious belief system about Bitcoin? What are the downsides and risks of it being out there? And are there any upsides too, such as putting a floor under Bitcoin pricing because these folks will never abandon it no matter how low the price goes and how long it stays there?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
To answer your last question first, yes. You can have zealots. You can have people who will hold it. They'll die for it. They will never sell. You know what a great example of this is? Tesla stock. Tesla is just a terrible stock based on valuation methods. Anything you look at tells us that Tesla should be like a $10 stock and not $800 stock right now. There are people who will never sell Tesla, and they've been very rewarded for that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin has those same kinds of zealots, think of it like a religion. I'm actually a Christian. I would say that the worship of money has been around for as long as money has existed for humans to use. It's in the Bible. You shall not worship money. You can only worship one or the other, God or money. So don't worship money.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
But people always have a propensity to magnify money, to worship money. And I think that's just obviously an erroneous view and a goofy view. There are people who treat it like it's going to save the world. Like it's going to abolish all immorality, anything unethical, abolish wars. I don't agree with that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Bitcoin is awesome. It's better money. It will create better incentives for the world, but it doesn't solve the human condition. The human condition I would say of sin or of immorality or of bad people just trying to take advantage of people. There will always be bad people. Criminals who will use even a good thing I think like Bitcoin to take advantage of other people, to steal their Bitcoin. And so, no, Bitcoin doesn't solve those kinds of problems. It should not be worshiped. It's not a God. It's just money. It's just better money I think, for the world.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, world governments have been a little slow in determining how to regulate this, how to tax it, what problems and what opportunities has that created? The fact that they're still trying to figure this out.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Well, lots of problems initially, as people say, and I think they're right. It's basically been the Wild Wild West. Bitcoin is what it started with and then all of crypto. Because it's unregulated, you get scammers, you get people who do what's called rug pulls, where they get you to buy into their crypto.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Mark Twain was famous, I believe, for saying a quote, “What is a gold miner? It's a hole in the ground with a liar standing next to it.” And I think that's true for a lot of altcoins in a lot of the crypto world. It's basically a liar or a marketer standing next to a white paper claiming to be able to do something. And so, people buy into it, they get into the hype, they buy it. And then what does a rug pull mean? It means the founders take that money, walk away with it. And the people who bought into it are left holding the bag, which is worth basically nothing at that point.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's the downside of not having regulations. Those are coming. The SEC, Gary Gensler, they're very intent on trying to fix this. They've said many times they consider most of these altcoins to be unregistered securities. They're saying if you are an altcoin and you think that you are an unregistered security, and I think you are, I'm looking at you, then you need to come and talk to us. Otherwise, we're going to come after you.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
First, they've been going after the exchanges that host these altcoins and allow these unregistered securities to operate. They may start coming after the individual cryptos themselves, or probably worse for them would just be, if they had a blanket banning of all of the exchanges and said, “You just can't buy or sell whatever the name of your altcoin is. You can't do that on our exchange.” That would probably make them go away, because there would be no more demand for them. So that would take away the market.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Regulation is coming. I would be careful if I had a lot of my net worth in altcoins. I would be very careful, even stablecoins have issues. We just saw this week, the stuff going on with Luna and UST, their stablecoin, they lost their peg. I think the last time I checked it was like 85 cents to the dollar. The founders are doing what they can. They bought a bunch of Bitcoin and they have given all that Bitcoin back in order to try to stabilize their currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
There are lots of ways you can lose money in the crypto world. So, I just beg people to please be careful. If you don't understand what you're speculating in, please don't do it or consider keeping your speculation size just really small.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk about taxation. The US government has elected to treat cryptocurrency essentially as an investment, applying Capital Gains Tax every time it's bought and sold, short or long term, if you've held it for more than a year, as the case may be.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
It's also allowed interestingly enough for tax-loss harvesting without the 30-day wash-sale rule, although recent legislation didn't pass would've changed that. Do you think the US government got it right? Do you think they chose the right way to tax this? How do you think it should be taxed? If it's digital gold, why is it not taxed at the collectibles rate of up to 28%? If it's a currency such as Yen or Euros, why is it not taxed as ordinary income tax rates like a Forex investment?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
To me, it's inevitable that Bitcoin within the next 10 years will be relabelled by the IRS as a currency, as basically money. And it will be then treated and taxed as such. The rest of crypto, which is not money, it's different. It's more of a speculative investment per se. That's probably the best category for it. It's kind of hard. They may need to create a new category for it just because it's a new type of asset. I think that's more reasonable.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think the use case for Bitcoin will go up significantly when it gets reorganized basically, or reconsidered as a currency, especially if we want to just use it for day-to-day purchases. If you're just holding Bitcoin, what keeps tons of Bitcoiners away from using it as a medium of exchange on a regular basis is it creates a tax event every single time they spend their Bitcoin.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If that is taken away, there are already a couple of countries where you don't get taxed. El Salvador, the Central Republic of Africa. Small countries so far, but more and more are starting to come on board. Then it will just be kind of seen as a currency.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
The wash-sale rule I think was a mistake. I think people can take advantage of those kinds of things and for better, for worse. I'm a big fan of smaller government and less regulation to begin with, but some regulation is probably necessary. I think that will probably get changed sometime in the near future. And it will be more in line with how stocks are treated from a tax basis. So, that's probably what will happen for crypto as well. I think it'll just get treated like how stocks are treated.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's talk a little bit about, you alluded to some hacks and some problems in the space. The wild west effect. Lots of investors fear losing their Bitcoin. They fear losing their Ethereum or Cardano or whatever due to hacks of exchanges or losing their keys. I mean, something like 20% of all the Bitcoin that's ever been mined has been lost at this point. How realistic is this fear and what can be done to counter these security issues?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Definitely realistic. I mean, it happens. We see exchanges getting hacked. I had an exchange personally that I used back in 2016, 2017 that got hacked and all assets have been frozen. I still don't have those cryptos back because of that. And we're four years into that. I see it happen to people all the time.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
What most Bitcoin proponents would tell you is when you buy a Bitcoin, get it off of an exchange and put it into cold storage and you can put it into a little USB kind of device where it just sort of sits there. Your keys, basically, it's your password sitting there and it's secure and nobody can come and get it from you. You can't lose it unless you just flat-out lose it. But nobody can really take it away from you. It can't be hacked because it's not connected to the internet at that point.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think it's just wise for people to consider “Look crypto exchanges, they are honeypots. Criminals want to go after that. They know that there are billions and billions of dollars’ worth of value in these exchanges if they can hack it and get into it. A DeFi protocol, a lot of people are trusting that because you can earn high-interest rates on whatever altcoin you have.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's great but you're taking the risk that the people who created that DeFi protocol, who did the code did not have any glitches in there that can be attacked. So, I would tell people to be very cautious with that and definitely not put a sizeable portion of your net worth into it. Just treat it like it is. It's a risky investment and your money is literally sitting there for savvy hackers to come and get. Make sure you know what you're doing. Take precautions.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you own Bitcoin, I recommend actually spreading it out in multiple areas so that you're not vulnerable to any individual point. Treat it like you would if you had gold bars, you're not just going to set your gold bars out on the counter and see if somebody comes and takes them. You'd probably keep them hidden, and take measures to make sure that they're safe. You do the same thing with cash.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you lose your Bitcoin, you lose your Bitcoin. There’s nobody you can call. There's no CEO to call to say, “Hey, I want my money back.” So, take precautions, treat it like cash, treat it like a gold bar and you'll do well.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Let's turn now back to your fund. Now, your fund's got a pretty good track record since inception. Really a very impressive one. You say it's designed to produce Alpha in all conditions. And when I look at your philosophy, the first rule is “Don't lose money.” The second rule is “Remember the first rule.” But in the last year you've lost 37%. What happened in the last year?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Yeah, it was a tough year. Well, two things happened. I'm a big proponent of Bitcoin. Bitcoin actually did well and was a major part of our fund last year. Because I was not able to hold Bitcoin directly, I was holding the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. Even though Bitcoin was up about 60% in 2021, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust actually went from a premium to a discount to nav. And the performance of that asset itself was about 0%. Literally Bitcoin went up 60%, GBTC was flat. So that was a terrible investment and a terrible way to have exposure to Bitcoin over the year.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
The second part of it was that I was anticipating a big ramp up into Bitcoin, got similar to the last four-year cycles thinking that we'd have a parabolic move higher. So, we were very exposed to that heading into the end of the year.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
November and December, and then the first parts of this year were tough years until I finally flipped bearish and put my investments more in line with my macro of views, basically. So yeah, we've had a tough year, no doubt. A lot of our hold forever assets have been getting hammered too. Things like most people own too, Apple, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway. Those things have all been getting hammered. Some of them not as bad as a market, some of them worse than the S&P 500 overall. Thankfully, we have our system in place where we're stopped out of the much more volatile assets.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That's kind of how it works for us at Vailshire and works for me, from having a more growth and innovative type approach. We tend to drastically outperform when times are good. And then we underperform more when times are bad, which over the long run we do very well. We're still significantly outperforming the S&P over three and five-year stretches, which is nice. But it's been a painful year. I'm not going to lie.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
But these are times where I think it's a fantastic time to be buying into a lot of these assets that are down 50% to 85% or so. I think we're getting close to a bottom and that 2, 3, 5, 10 years from now the prices that we're going to be able to get today and for the next couple of months, I can't promise anything obviously, I always have to watch what I say, but it's hard for me to conceive that they won't beat the market substantially in the coming years.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Now, our time is getting short, but you have the year of somewhere between 30,000 and 40,000 high-income professionals, mostly doctors. What have we not yet talked about today that you think they should know?

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Well, the first thing I would say, I'm a proponent of Bitcoin, obviously, based on our conversation. I just encourage you to think of it, first of all, as distinct from the rest of crypto and to just simply see it as better money, and then to take the time to figure out why. It really only takes a few hours of studying, maybe one or two good books. And I think you'll be right there with me on that.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
If you don't have any allocation to Bitcoin, I would strongly recommend just getting off of 0% and maybe putting up to 1%. Thinking of it as a hedge to the Fiat system, which I would say it's almost inarguable that the system is crumbling right now. We're seeing cracks in the foundation. We're living in very tumultuous times. Prices are getting high. We're going to be, I think, in a stagflationary environment for most of this decade.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
I think the traditional 60/40 Vanguard index fund protocol that has worked really well for the last decade, I just don't think it's going to work very well this decade based on the prices of everything and how bonds are performing and things like that. There's a chance we could be at the beginning of a multi-decade bond bear market at this point, which would make owning bonds a pretty bad decision from a risk-adjusted return standpoint.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
That would be my main thing. Consider alternatives to just that. If you want to know more about, and I don't mean to be doing a plug right here, but if you want to learn more about these kinds of alternative strategies, look me up. You can go to vailshire.com. You can send me an email directly, just info@vailshire.com. And then I'm always happy to answer questions about my macro views, finance, Bitcoin, that kind of stuff on Twitter. I'm on Twitter a lot. So, feel free to look me up there and we can continue the conversation.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
All right, we've been talking with hedge fund manager, Jeff Ross MD, MBA. Thank you for your time and for being willing to come on the White Coat Investor podcast and share your views and knowledge.

Dr. Jeff Ross:
Thanks for having me on, Jim. I really appreciate it.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
I hope you enjoyed that podcast. It was a little different from our usual fair I'll admit, but it's fun to do different every now and then. I'll probably get a bunch of hate mail from people that hate it who can't believe I put a hedge fund manager, much less one talking about Bitcoin on the podcast. But I got hate mail when I put a professional cyclist on the podcast too. So, I guess that's just par for the course.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
I got to admit, I'm not convinced to go out and buy a bunch of Bitcoin, much less any other crypto assets at this point. He makes a strong case. He argues strongly for Bitcoin being the winner among these crypto assets. I'm not entirely convinced of that, but I'll admit the Lightning Network changes addressed significantly some of the concerns I had with Bitcoin.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
If they continue to come up with improvements on it like that, maybe at some point we will be using it as a currency. But man, it's been 12 years. How long is it going to take before we can start using this thing as a currency? It'd be great to find a way to cut down on the credit card fees you pay every time you buy and sell something. That would be wonderful.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Certainly, crypto assets have a significant benefit in getting assets out of a country in times of political turmoil. There's no doubt about it. Every time I fly internationally, I think about that when I see the $10,000 limit you're allowed to carry with you. Obviously, if you have a thumb drive with a bunch of Bitcoin on it, Bitcoin keys on it, you could take a whole lot more than $10,000.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
So, there are some use cases for it, but I'm a little skeptical that it's going to be this currency that we're all using within just a few years, because I've been hearing that now for more than a decade and it just hasn't happened yet. Maybe we are still early, but I'm starting to lose faith in it, I suppose. We'll see.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
I hope you enjoyed the podcast though. I hope that was interesting to you and a chance to maybe hear a different viewpoint than I put on the podcast about Bitcoin or on the blog about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
As a reminder, check out that book on Amazon, The White Coat Investors Guide to Asset Protection. I think it's great. I use it as a reference every time I want to look up asset protection laws because they're all in one place. It's very handy that way.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
This podcast was sponsored by Bob Bhayani at drdisabilityquotes.com. He's been a long-time sponsor of the White Coat Investor. One listener sent us this review. “My experience with drdisabilityquotes.com was great. They're very quick to respond and answer all of my questions. I appreciated how easy the process was to get quotes and the fact that there was no pressure as I took my time to decide which plan I wanted to go with.”

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Contact Bob at drdisabilityquotes.com today, by email at info@drdisabilityquotes.com or by simply calling (973) 771-9100 to get disability insurance in place today.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
Thanks for those of you leaving us a five-star review and telling your friends about the podcast. Our most recent one came in and said, “Some great interviews, not every show has in-depth interviews, but those that do are usually winners. It's great when Jim brings in those new perspectives.” Five stars. Well hopefully, Kdog1 you appreciate today's episode as well, which is a fairly in-depth interview.

Dr. Jim Dahle:
For the rest of you, keep your head up, your shoulders back. You've got this and we can help. We'll see you next time on the White Coat Investor podcast.

Disclaimer:
The hosts of the White Coat Investor podcast are not licensed accountants, attorneys, or financial advisors. This podcast is for your entertainment and information only. It should not be considered professional or personalized financial advice. You should consult the appropriate professional for specific advice relating to your situation.

The post Investing in Crypto-Assets with Hedge Fund Manager, Dr. Jeff Ross appeared first on The White Coat Investor - Investing & Personal Finance for Doctors.